From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I first became active (2007) my most active area of academic work was in all types of mathematical models of cognition. I was on-and-off for years before reactivating with the community again in 2022, by which point my editing interest was much more toward fields I don't research.

I highly recommend all new and current academic Wikipedians shift to edit outside their fields if this has not already begun naturally, though I warn you that if you thought you struggled with citations when you know the field, you ain't seen nothing about editing yet.


Edit style notes

  • It is no exaggeration to say that I would rather see an article written with garbage sources and a good editor, than the reverse. [Source: My twist on Sash Petraske's quotation about ice and cocktails, as quoted in Solmonson & Solmonson (2014), The 12 Bottle Bar, p. 26.]
  • I generally transcribe all English reduced vowels as schwa to emphasize their neutralness, though I have no strong feelings about it one way or the other.
  • As an editor I greatly prefer using {{ math}} to <math/> tags, but from a UX perspective I don't know the technical debate well. A template that converted {{ math}}'s syntax to TeX inside <math/> is maybe feasible.
  • Wikiphilosophy hasn't meant much since 2010-2012-ish when equilibrium standards of inclusion were pretty well agreed, but if you see me trashing your article I'm an "inclusionist-exclusionist" who wants to keep all they can salvage and dump all the junk ( 10YT is my policy of the month). The topic of the article sets the standards for rigor of sourcing, but regardless of standards, any statement directly attributed to a source must accurately reflect that source. I do a random spot-check of almost every article I read to see whether this might not be done in general, and the failure rate is disturbingly high, especially in political articles. SamuelRiv ( talk) 02:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Articles

etc.

Significant edits

Projects

Universal legal citation template

Initial proposal at WProj Law (2022-07-03 ongoing)

  • Subproject A: Cross-European legal citation template
    • Phase 1: Preliminary survey: Complete (2022-07 late.)
      • Notes: Electronic lookup quality, standards implementation, and public access spotty throughout EU. Once you hit the Caucuses, glhf.
    • Phase 2: Template implementation: Existing Euro law templates all updated (2022-07 end)
    • Phase 3: Unified European citation style research: In progress (notes in /DraftTemplate)
    • Phase 4: Begin unification (planning: will have to finish getting scope of each country's online accessibility and current encoding, as not all legal documents, that will be, have been given electronic identifiers)

Template scope:

Drafts

WIP or on hold, or cancelled but still used as a demo:


Meta

Links of convenience:

To do

Favorite simple proofs

New trickier weirdness

  • Reactionless drives made simple: the bare minimum standards for stupid ideas.
  • Cannibalism: Should you eat the fat guy? The answer may surprise you!
  • That probability you were wondering about? Probably 56%
  • How many photons can you really see?
  • Longest contraction I can think of: y'know'i'll've'd'a ("you know I will have had to" +infinitive) - /jnoɫvt⁼/ in a single syllable. (2007 I think)
rev. 2011ish??? have to check notes: y'all'd've'd't'a

Temporary external safe test section

I don't want to make another page for this -- this is just to test sandbox stuff from an external page, and should be perfectly safe.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I first became active (2007) my most active area of academic work was in all types of mathematical models of cognition. I was on-and-off for years before reactivating with the community again in 2022, by which point my editing interest was much more toward fields I don't research.

I highly recommend all new and current academic Wikipedians shift to edit outside their fields if this has not already begun naturally, though I warn you that if you thought you struggled with citations when you know the field, you ain't seen nothing about editing yet.


Edit style notes

  • It is no exaggeration to say that I would rather see an article written with garbage sources and a good editor, than the reverse. [Source: My twist on Sash Petraske's quotation about ice and cocktails, as quoted in Solmonson & Solmonson (2014), The 12 Bottle Bar, p. 26.]
  • I generally transcribe all English reduced vowels as schwa to emphasize their neutralness, though I have no strong feelings about it one way or the other.
  • As an editor I greatly prefer using {{ math}} to <math/> tags, but from a UX perspective I don't know the technical debate well. A template that converted {{ math}}'s syntax to TeX inside <math/> is maybe feasible.
  • Wikiphilosophy hasn't meant much since 2010-2012-ish when equilibrium standards of inclusion were pretty well agreed, but if you see me trashing your article I'm an "inclusionist-exclusionist" who wants to keep all they can salvage and dump all the junk ( 10YT is my policy of the month). The topic of the article sets the standards for rigor of sourcing, but regardless of standards, any statement directly attributed to a source must accurately reflect that source. I do a random spot-check of almost every article I read to see whether this might not be done in general, and the failure rate is disturbingly high, especially in political articles. SamuelRiv ( talk) 02:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Articles

etc.

Significant edits

Projects

Universal legal citation template

Initial proposal at WProj Law (2022-07-03 ongoing)

  • Subproject A: Cross-European legal citation template
    • Phase 1: Preliminary survey: Complete (2022-07 late.)
      • Notes: Electronic lookup quality, standards implementation, and public access spotty throughout EU. Once you hit the Caucuses, glhf.
    • Phase 2: Template implementation: Existing Euro law templates all updated (2022-07 end)
    • Phase 3: Unified European citation style research: In progress (notes in /DraftTemplate)
    • Phase 4: Begin unification (planning: will have to finish getting scope of each country's online accessibility and current encoding, as not all legal documents, that will be, have been given electronic identifiers)

Template scope:

Drafts

WIP or on hold, or cancelled but still used as a demo:


Meta

Links of convenience:

To do

Favorite simple proofs

New trickier weirdness

  • Reactionless drives made simple: the bare minimum standards for stupid ideas.
  • Cannibalism: Should you eat the fat guy? The answer may surprise you!
  • That probability you were wondering about? Probably 56%
  • How many photons can you really see?
  • Longest contraction I can think of: y'know'i'll've'd'a ("you know I will have had to" +infinitive) - /jnoɫvt⁼/ in a single syllable. (2007 I think)
rev. 2011ish??? have to check notes: y'all'd've'd't'a

Temporary external safe test section

I don't want to make another page for this -- this is just to test sandbox stuff from an external page, and should be perfectly safe.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook