This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I'm removing the characters from this template. They probably need their own template, or something, because this one looks really bulky right now. --
Dynamite Eleven
19:12, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
PS: Just to give you an idea for a possible character template, here's what I salvaged from the previous edit
[1]:
{{
Back to the Future characters}}
"no" importance seems a bit harsh for the navigation template of a substantial cluster of articles about an important film trilogy. I've reclassed it as mid, which seems a reasonable compromise given that I personally consider it of high importance (within the context of navigation boxes, anyway). I've actually used it to navigate! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 21:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I've updated this template to take over for the sidebar, I hope, which takes up way too much article real estate, esp. for articles with infoboxes. I don't think the characters take up too much space, since this navbox sits at the bottom of the article anyway, and now that navboxes hide, I think it's sufficient to include everything in one template. TheHYPO ( talk) 14:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I'm removing the characters from this template. They probably need their own template, or something, because this one looks really bulky right now. --
Dynamite Eleven
19:12, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
PS: Just to give you an idea for a possible character template, here's what I salvaged from the previous edit
[1]:
{{
Back to the Future characters}}
"no" importance seems a bit harsh for the navigation template of a substantial cluster of articles about an important film trilogy. I've reclassed it as mid, which seems a reasonable compromise given that I personally consider it of high importance (within the context of navigation boxes, anyway). I've actually used it to navigate! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 21:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I've updated this template to take over for the sidebar, I hope, which takes up way too much article real estate, esp. for articles with infoboxes. I don't think the characters take up too much space, since this navbox sits at the bottom of the article anyway, and now that navboxes hide, I think it's sufficient to include everything in one template. TheHYPO ( talk) 14:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)