This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Addiction glossary template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2015 January 15. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
This should be at the bottom as a navbox. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 06:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The orange background of the header has insufficient contrast with the foreground text, per WP:COLOUR. I removed it (citing WP:COLOUR in my edit summary), but have been reverted on the spurious grounds that other templates also exhibit this problem. Making our content accessible to people with disabilities is not an option; it is required by WMF policy. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
I disagree. "Abuse" and "misuse" are highly subjective terms, but don't confuse "abuse" with "abuse liability" which is a largely reducible quality of psychoactive drugs. Abuse liability/potential is precisely a psychpharmacological quality, an evaluation of which is currently required in new drug applications to the FDA and used by the DEA to apply scheduling. The term(s) occur in current drug monographs. "Abuse liability" could be changed to "addiction liability" and would apply to the same definition. So how about this change?
Since the term "drug sensitization" is listed, there is no need for "sensitization" itself. It is not specific to drug addiction but is simply a term from behaviorism. Further, the term "stimuli" should be softened (replaced) to deal with drugs and not behaviorism. The term addictive behavior needs to be tweaked as well. (It opens the door to "addictive personality" which has the same problems as "abuse".) How could the terms noted above be tweaked?
I generally agree with your intentions but I perceive them as a tad rigid. Biologic mechanisms are essential but there is a dimension to human addiction (e.g., set) that doesn't exist in pigeons or rats. Behaviorism can't explain and generally takes no interest in the hard problem. IMO if the intention of this glossary is based in behaviorism then "behaviorism" should be included in the displayed title and the opportunity for a general glossary be created. — Box73 ( talk) 21:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Dear @ Seppi333:
This glossary is used in articles read by laypeople, such as Food addiction.
You dealt with the {{ jargon-inline}} tags which I added to the glossary a couple of weeks ago. In your edit summary, you wrote that almost every piece of jargon which I tagged is a nontechnical word which would be defined in any half-decent dictionary. I partially agree. I do agree that "characterized", "engagement", "adaptive", and "cessation" are found in every dictionary. But I still think they're not easy words for laypeople to understand.
George Orwell has written:
Dear all: Are there more-common words, simpler than "characterized", "engagement", "adaptive", "cessation", "stimuli", and "somatic", which we could use instead?
Kind regards, TealHill ( talk) 16:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
@
Frietjes: I'm not sure what's causing this issue. Previously, this the collapsed header for this template aligned perfectly with the width of the image beneath it in
Amphetamine#Addiction. Now, the entire glossary table is shifted to the right by a few pixels and it looks awkward. The same issue is occurring in the 3 articles that transclude that section of amphetamine (
Adderall#Addiction,
Lisdexamfetamine#Addiction, and
Dextroamphetamine#Addiction) as well as
Methamphetamine#Addiction and
ΔFosB.
NB: you didn't change the class parameter in
ΔFosB. It
displayed with broken formatting until the quotation marks were removed; please be more careful next time.
Interestingly, the alignment of this glossary with the table above it in the Reward system article isn't broken/skewed, so this appears to only be an issue with adjacent images.
The only way I can think of fixing this at the moment is reverting some of your changes to this template, which would also necessitate reverting the changes to all of the articles that transclude this template. However, I figured I'd ping you to see if we can come up with a fix to the current formatting in order to address this problem. Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢) 02:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
How the glossary and image appear on the above pages
| |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notice how the right margin for the glossary is slightly further to the right than the image below it. It appears to be skewed rightward by somewhere between 2px to 5px. Previously, the glossary and image left+right margins aligned perfectly.
|
|collapsed=y
instead of having to say |class=toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed
. and, finally, how about using infobox
as the basic class and actual list markup? to show what I am talking about, see
Template:Addiction glossary/sandbox.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC){{
AI4}}
when the table nesting was introduced to that template. I've explained the purpose of that markup and illustrated the issue it resolved on that template's talk page (
Template talk:Annotated image 4). I'm not sure how else to resolve that issue besides nesting the entire template in a borderless wikitable though.
Seppi333 (
Insert 2¢) 05:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@
Frietjes: Do you have any objections to me creating
Template:Glossary infobox† as a glossary skeleton template which uses the infobox layout for this template? If I created that template, I would update {{
Addiction glossary}}
and {{
Transcription factor glossary}}
so that they both use/transclude that template for setting their layout (note: see the two collapse tabs below for further details). I'm sure other editors will create similar table-based glossaries for articles at some point in the future, so I think that creating a template for standardizing the layout of those glossaries now is a good idea.
†The reason I'm proposing the title "Template:Glossary infobox" for the template instead of "Template:Infobox glossary" is that I think it's much more likely that people will search for "Template:Glossary ..." in the search box when looking for glossary templates; if the template was located at
Template:Infobox glossary, it wouldn't appear in the results from the search box when searching for "Template:Glossary ..."; however, "Template:Infobox glossary" probably would appear in the extended search results from
Special:Search/Template:Glossary though.
Seppi333 (
Insert 2¢) 11:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The markup that I'd use to create
Template:Glossary infobox
| ||
---|---|---|
Note: The " {{infobox | bodyclass = {{#if:{{yesno|{{{collapse|}}}}}|mw-collapsible mw-collapsed}} | bodystyle = width:{{{width|400px}}}; {{#switch:{{{align|right}}} | left = float:left; clear:left; margin-left:0; margin-right:1em; }}; border-collapse:collapse; | datastyle = text-align:left; padding-left:0; | abovestyle = font-size:100%; background:#FFCC66; {{box-shadow border|a|#fafafa|3px}}; padding:5px; | above = {{{above|{{{header|}}}}}} | data1 = {{{data1|{{{definitions|}}}}}} | belowstyle = text-align:right; padding-top:0; padding-right:5px; | below = {{#if:{{yesno|{{{1|{{{template name|}}}}}}}}|{{navbar|{{{1|{{{template name|}}}}}}|mini=y}}|}} }}
|
This is the markup that I'd use in this template after creating "Template:Glossary infobox"
|
---|
{{Glossary infobox | template name = Addiction glossary | align = {{{align|right}}} | width = {{{width|402px}}} | collapse = {{{collapse|}}} | header = Addiction and dependence glossary{{ifeq|{{{reverse citation order}}}|yes|<ref name="Cellular basis">{{cite journal | author = Nestler EJ | title = Cellular basis of memory for addiction | journal = Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. | volume = 15 | issue = 4 | pages = 431–443 |date=December 2013 | pmid = 24459410 | pmc = 3898681 | doi = | quote = Despite the importance of numerous psychosocial factors, at its core, drug addiction involves a biological process: the ability of repeated exposure to a drug of abuse to induce changes in a vulnerable brain that drive the compulsive seeking and taking of drugs, and loss of control over drug use, that define a state of addiction. ... A large body of literature has demonstrated that such ΔFosB induction in D1-type [nucleus accumbens] neurons increases an animal's sensitivity to drug as well as natural rewards and promotes drug self-administration, presumably through a process of positive reinforcement ... Another ΔFosB target is cFos: as ΔFosB accumulates with repeated drug exposure it represses c-Fos and contributes to the molecular switch whereby ΔFosB is selectively induced in the chronic drug-treated state.<sup>41</sup>. ... Moreover, there is increasing evidence that, despite a range of genetic risks for addiction across the population, exposure to sufficiently high doses of a drug for long periods of time can transform someone who has relatively lower genetic loading into an addict.}}</ref><ref name="Addiction glossary">{{cite book |vauthors=Malenka RC, Nestler EJ, Hyman SE |veditors=Sydor A, Brown RY | title = Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience | year = 2009 | publisher = McGraw-Hill Medical | location = New York | isbn = 9780071481274 | pages = 364–375| edition = 2nd | chapter = Chapter 15: Reinforcement and Addictive Disorders}}</ref><!-- Reverse citation order -->|<!-- --><ref name="Addiction glossary">{{cite book |vauthors=Malenka RC, Nestler EJ, Hyman SE |veditors=Sydor A, Brown RY | title = Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience | year = 2009 | publisher = McGraw-Hill Medical | location = New York | isbn = 9780071481274 | pages = 364–375| edition = 2nd | chapter = Chapter 15: Reinforcement and Addictive Disorders}}</ref><ref name="Cellular basis">{{cite journal | author = Nestler EJ | title = Cellular basis of memory for addiction | journal = Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. | volume = 15 | issue = 4 | pages = 431–443 |date=December 2013 | pmid = 24459410 | pmc = 3898681 | doi = | quote = Despite the importance of numerous psychosocial factors, at its core, drug addiction involves a biological process: the ability of repeated exposure to a drug of abuse to induce changes in a vulnerable brain that drive the compulsive seeking and taking of drugs, and loss of control over drug use, that define a state of addiction. ... A large body of literature has demonstrated that such ΔFosB induction in D1-type [nucleus accumbens] neurons increases an animal's sensitivity to drug as well as natural rewards and promotes drug self-administration, presumably through a process of positive reinforcement ... Another ΔFosB target is cFos: as ΔFosB accumulates with repeated drug exposure it represses c-Fos and contributes to the molecular switch whereby ΔFosB is selectively induced in the chronic drug-treated state.<sup>41</sup>. ... Moreover, there is increasing evidence that, despite a range of genetic risks for addiction across the population, exposure to sufficiently high doses of a drug for long periods of time can transform someone who has relatively lower genetic loading into an addict.}}</ref>}}<ref name="Nestler Labs Glossary">{{cite web|title=Glossary of Terms|url=http://neuroscience.mssm.edu/nestler/glossary.html|website=Mount Sinai School of Medicine|publisher=Department of Neuroscience|accessdate=9 February 2015}}</ref><ref name="Brain disease">{{cite journal | vauthors = Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT | title = Neurobiologic Advances from the Brain Disease Model of Addiction | journal = N. Engl. J. Med. | volume = 374 | issue = 4 | pages = 363–371 | date = January 2016 | pmid = 26816013 | doi = 10.1056/NEJMra1511480 | quote = Substance-use disorder: A diagnostic term in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) referring to recurrent use of alcohol or other drugs that causes clinically and functionally significant impairment, such as health problems, disability, and failure to meet major responsibilities at work, school, or home. Depending on the level of severity, this disorder is classified as mild, moderate, or severe.<br />Addiction: A term used to indicate the most severe, chronic stage of substance-use disorder, in which there is a substantial loss of self-control, as indicated by compulsive drug taking despite the desire to stop taking the drug. In the DSM-5, the term addiction is synonymous with the classification of severe substance-use disorder.}}</ref> | data1 = * '''[[addiction]]''' – a [[brain disorder]] characterized by [[wikt:compulsive|compulsive]] engagement in rewarding [[Stimulus (psychology)|stimuli]] despite adverse consequences * '''[[addictive behavior]]''' – a behavior that is both rewarding and reinforcing * '''[[addiction|addictive drug]]''' – a drug that is both rewarding and reinforcing * '''[[Substance dependence|dependence]]''' – an adaptive state associated with a withdrawal syndrome upon cessation of repeated exposure to a stimulus (e.g., drug intake) * '''[[reverse tolerance|drug sensitization]]''' or '''reverse tolerance''' – the escalating effect of a drug resulting from repeated administration at a given dose * '''[[drug withdrawal]]''' – symptoms that occur upon cessation of repeated drug use * '''[[physical dependence]]''' – dependence that involves persistent physical–[[wikt:somatic|somatic]] withdrawal symptoms (e.g., fatigue and [[delirium tremens]]) * '''[[psychological dependence]]''' – dependence that involves emotional–motivational withdrawal symptoms (e.g., [[dysphoria]] and [[anhedonia]]) * '''[[reinforcement|reinforcing]] stimuli''' – stimuli that increase the probability of repeating behaviors paired with them * '''[[reward system|rewarding]] stimuli''' – stimuli that the brain interprets as intrinsically positive and desirable or as something to approach * '''[[sensitization]]''' – an amplified response to a stimulus resulting from repeated exposure to it * '''[[substance use disorder]]''' – a condition in which the use of substances leads to clinically and functionally significant impairment or distress * '''[[drug tolerance|tolerance]]''' – the diminishing effect of a drug resulting from repeated administration at a given dose }} |
FWIW, I've already tested my proposed code for {{
Glossary infobox}}
and the proposed changes to {{
Addiction glossary}}
in two of my sandboxes, so I know my proposed template code works as expected.
Seppi333 (
Insert 2¢) 11:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Addiction glossary template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2015 January 15. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
This should be at the bottom as a navbox. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 06:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The orange background of the header has insufficient contrast with the foreground text, per WP:COLOUR. I removed it (citing WP:COLOUR in my edit summary), but have been reverted on the spurious grounds that other templates also exhibit this problem. Making our content accessible to people with disabilities is not an option; it is required by WMF policy. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
I disagree. "Abuse" and "misuse" are highly subjective terms, but don't confuse "abuse" with "abuse liability" which is a largely reducible quality of psychoactive drugs. Abuse liability/potential is precisely a psychpharmacological quality, an evaluation of which is currently required in new drug applications to the FDA and used by the DEA to apply scheduling. The term(s) occur in current drug monographs. "Abuse liability" could be changed to "addiction liability" and would apply to the same definition. So how about this change?
Since the term "drug sensitization" is listed, there is no need for "sensitization" itself. It is not specific to drug addiction but is simply a term from behaviorism. Further, the term "stimuli" should be softened (replaced) to deal with drugs and not behaviorism. The term addictive behavior needs to be tweaked as well. (It opens the door to "addictive personality" which has the same problems as "abuse".) How could the terms noted above be tweaked?
I generally agree with your intentions but I perceive them as a tad rigid. Biologic mechanisms are essential but there is a dimension to human addiction (e.g., set) that doesn't exist in pigeons or rats. Behaviorism can't explain and generally takes no interest in the hard problem. IMO if the intention of this glossary is based in behaviorism then "behaviorism" should be included in the displayed title and the opportunity for a general glossary be created. — Box73 ( talk) 21:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Dear @ Seppi333:
This glossary is used in articles read by laypeople, such as Food addiction.
You dealt with the {{ jargon-inline}} tags which I added to the glossary a couple of weeks ago. In your edit summary, you wrote that almost every piece of jargon which I tagged is a nontechnical word which would be defined in any half-decent dictionary. I partially agree. I do agree that "characterized", "engagement", "adaptive", and "cessation" are found in every dictionary. But I still think they're not easy words for laypeople to understand.
George Orwell has written:
Dear all: Are there more-common words, simpler than "characterized", "engagement", "adaptive", "cessation", "stimuli", and "somatic", which we could use instead?
Kind regards, TealHill ( talk) 16:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
@
Frietjes: I'm not sure what's causing this issue. Previously, this the collapsed header for this template aligned perfectly with the width of the image beneath it in
Amphetamine#Addiction. Now, the entire glossary table is shifted to the right by a few pixels and it looks awkward. The same issue is occurring in the 3 articles that transclude that section of amphetamine (
Adderall#Addiction,
Lisdexamfetamine#Addiction, and
Dextroamphetamine#Addiction) as well as
Methamphetamine#Addiction and
ΔFosB.
NB: you didn't change the class parameter in
ΔFosB. It
displayed with broken formatting until the quotation marks were removed; please be more careful next time.
Interestingly, the alignment of this glossary with the table above it in the Reward system article isn't broken/skewed, so this appears to only be an issue with adjacent images.
The only way I can think of fixing this at the moment is reverting some of your changes to this template, which would also necessitate reverting the changes to all of the articles that transclude this template. However, I figured I'd ping you to see if we can come up with a fix to the current formatting in order to address this problem. Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢) 02:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
How the glossary and image appear on the above pages
| |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notice how the right margin for the glossary is slightly further to the right than the image below it. It appears to be skewed rightward by somewhere between 2px to 5px. Previously, the glossary and image left+right margins aligned perfectly.
|
|collapsed=y
instead of having to say |class=toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed
. and, finally, how about using infobox
as the basic class and actual list markup? to show what I am talking about, see
Template:Addiction glossary/sandbox.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC){{
AI4}}
when the table nesting was introduced to that template. I've explained the purpose of that markup and illustrated the issue it resolved on that template's talk page (
Template talk:Annotated image 4). I'm not sure how else to resolve that issue besides nesting the entire template in a borderless wikitable though.
Seppi333 (
Insert 2¢) 05:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@
Frietjes: Do you have any objections to me creating
Template:Glossary infobox† as a glossary skeleton template which uses the infobox layout for this template? If I created that template, I would update {{
Addiction glossary}}
and {{
Transcription factor glossary}}
so that they both use/transclude that template for setting their layout (note: see the two collapse tabs below for further details). I'm sure other editors will create similar table-based glossaries for articles at some point in the future, so I think that creating a template for standardizing the layout of those glossaries now is a good idea.
†The reason I'm proposing the title "Template:Glossary infobox" for the template instead of "Template:Infobox glossary" is that I think it's much more likely that people will search for "Template:Glossary ..." in the search box when looking for glossary templates; if the template was located at
Template:Infobox glossary, it wouldn't appear in the results from the search box when searching for "Template:Glossary ..."; however, "Template:Infobox glossary" probably would appear in the extended search results from
Special:Search/Template:Glossary though.
Seppi333 (
Insert 2¢) 11:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The markup that I'd use to create
Template:Glossary infobox
| ||
---|---|---|
Note: The " {{infobox | bodyclass = {{#if:{{yesno|{{{collapse|}}}}}|mw-collapsible mw-collapsed}} | bodystyle = width:{{{width|400px}}}; {{#switch:{{{align|right}}} | left = float:left; clear:left; margin-left:0; margin-right:1em; }}; border-collapse:collapse; | datastyle = text-align:left; padding-left:0; | abovestyle = font-size:100%; background:#FFCC66; {{box-shadow border|a|#fafafa|3px}}; padding:5px; | above = {{{above|{{{header|}}}}}} | data1 = {{{data1|{{{definitions|}}}}}} | belowstyle = text-align:right; padding-top:0; padding-right:5px; | below = {{#if:{{yesno|{{{1|{{{template name|}}}}}}}}|{{navbar|{{{1|{{{template name|}}}}}}|mini=y}}|}} }}
|
This is the markup that I'd use in this template after creating "Template:Glossary infobox"
|
---|
{{Glossary infobox | template name = Addiction glossary | align = {{{align|right}}} | width = {{{width|402px}}} | collapse = {{{collapse|}}} | header = Addiction and dependence glossary{{ifeq|{{{reverse citation order}}}|yes|<ref name="Cellular basis">{{cite journal | author = Nestler EJ | title = Cellular basis of memory for addiction | journal = Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. | volume = 15 | issue = 4 | pages = 431–443 |date=December 2013 | pmid = 24459410 | pmc = 3898681 | doi = | quote = Despite the importance of numerous psychosocial factors, at its core, drug addiction involves a biological process: the ability of repeated exposure to a drug of abuse to induce changes in a vulnerable brain that drive the compulsive seeking and taking of drugs, and loss of control over drug use, that define a state of addiction. ... A large body of literature has demonstrated that such ΔFosB induction in D1-type [nucleus accumbens] neurons increases an animal's sensitivity to drug as well as natural rewards and promotes drug self-administration, presumably through a process of positive reinforcement ... Another ΔFosB target is cFos: as ΔFosB accumulates with repeated drug exposure it represses c-Fos and contributes to the molecular switch whereby ΔFosB is selectively induced in the chronic drug-treated state.<sup>41</sup>. ... Moreover, there is increasing evidence that, despite a range of genetic risks for addiction across the population, exposure to sufficiently high doses of a drug for long periods of time can transform someone who has relatively lower genetic loading into an addict.}}</ref><ref name="Addiction glossary">{{cite book |vauthors=Malenka RC, Nestler EJ, Hyman SE |veditors=Sydor A, Brown RY | title = Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience | year = 2009 | publisher = McGraw-Hill Medical | location = New York | isbn = 9780071481274 | pages = 364–375| edition = 2nd | chapter = Chapter 15: Reinforcement and Addictive Disorders}}</ref><!-- Reverse citation order -->|<!-- --><ref name="Addiction glossary">{{cite book |vauthors=Malenka RC, Nestler EJ, Hyman SE |veditors=Sydor A, Brown RY | title = Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience | year = 2009 | publisher = McGraw-Hill Medical | location = New York | isbn = 9780071481274 | pages = 364–375| edition = 2nd | chapter = Chapter 15: Reinforcement and Addictive Disorders}}</ref><ref name="Cellular basis">{{cite journal | author = Nestler EJ | title = Cellular basis of memory for addiction | journal = Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. | volume = 15 | issue = 4 | pages = 431–443 |date=December 2013 | pmid = 24459410 | pmc = 3898681 | doi = | quote = Despite the importance of numerous psychosocial factors, at its core, drug addiction involves a biological process: the ability of repeated exposure to a drug of abuse to induce changes in a vulnerable brain that drive the compulsive seeking and taking of drugs, and loss of control over drug use, that define a state of addiction. ... A large body of literature has demonstrated that such ΔFosB induction in D1-type [nucleus accumbens] neurons increases an animal's sensitivity to drug as well as natural rewards and promotes drug self-administration, presumably through a process of positive reinforcement ... Another ΔFosB target is cFos: as ΔFosB accumulates with repeated drug exposure it represses c-Fos and contributes to the molecular switch whereby ΔFosB is selectively induced in the chronic drug-treated state.<sup>41</sup>. ... Moreover, there is increasing evidence that, despite a range of genetic risks for addiction across the population, exposure to sufficiently high doses of a drug for long periods of time can transform someone who has relatively lower genetic loading into an addict.}}</ref>}}<ref name="Nestler Labs Glossary">{{cite web|title=Glossary of Terms|url=http://neuroscience.mssm.edu/nestler/glossary.html|website=Mount Sinai School of Medicine|publisher=Department of Neuroscience|accessdate=9 February 2015}}</ref><ref name="Brain disease">{{cite journal | vauthors = Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT | title = Neurobiologic Advances from the Brain Disease Model of Addiction | journal = N. Engl. J. Med. | volume = 374 | issue = 4 | pages = 363–371 | date = January 2016 | pmid = 26816013 | doi = 10.1056/NEJMra1511480 | quote = Substance-use disorder: A diagnostic term in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) referring to recurrent use of alcohol or other drugs that causes clinically and functionally significant impairment, such as health problems, disability, and failure to meet major responsibilities at work, school, or home. Depending on the level of severity, this disorder is classified as mild, moderate, or severe.<br />Addiction: A term used to indicate the most severe, chronic stage of substance-use disorder, in which there is a substantial loss of self-control, as indicated by compulsive drug taking despite the desire to stop taking the drug. In the DSM-5, the term addiction is synonymous with the classification of severe substance-use disorder.}}</ref> | data1 = * '''[[addiction]]''' – a [[brain disorder]] characterized by [[wikt:compulsive|compulsive]] engagement in rewarding [[Stimulus (psychology)|stimuli]] despite adverse consequences * '''[[addictive behavior]]''' – a behavior that is both rewarding and reinforcing * '''[[addiction|addictive drug]]''' – a drug that is both rewarding and reinforcing * '''[[Substance dependence|dependence]]''' – an adaptive state associated with a withdrawal syndrome upon cessation of repeated exposure to a stimulus (e.g., drug intake) * '''[[reverse tolerance|drug sensitization]]''' or '''reverse tolerance''' – the escalating effect of a drug resulting from repeated administration at a given dose * '''[[drug withdrawal]]''' – symptoms that occur upon cessation of repeated drug use * '''[[physical dependence]]''' – dependence that involves persistent physical–[[wikt:somatic|somatic]] withdrawal symptoms (e.g., fatigue and [[delirium tremens]]) * '''[[psychological dependence]]''' – dependence that involves emotional–motivational withdrawal symptoms (e.g., [[dysphoria]] and [[anhedonia]]) * '''[[reinforcement|reinforcing]] stimuli''' – stimuli that increase the probability of repeating behaviors paired with them * '''[[reward system|rewarding]] stimuli''' – stimuli that the brain interprets as intrinsically positive and desirable or as something to approach * '''[[sensitization]]''' – an amplified response to a stimulus resulting from repeated exposure to it * '''[[substance use disorder]]''' – a condition in which the use of substances leads to clinically and functionally significant impairment or distress * '''[[drug tolerance|tolerance]]''' – the diminishing effect of a drug resulting from repeated administration at a given dose }} |
FWIW, I've already tested my proposed code for {{
Glossary infobox}}
and the proposed changes to {{
Addiction glossary}}
in two of my sandboxes, so I know my proposed template code works as expected.
Seppi333 (
Insert 2¢) 11:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)