The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 08:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Comment: She's running for office, and the election isn't until November 6. It's probably a bad idea to post an active candidate on the main page so close to the election, so I propose this, if approved, be placed in a holding area for mid-November.
I'll assume good faith on the subscription-only refs - rest looks good. Size and age ok and hook reffed. I'm leaning towards the first one. Not so sure the second one is great for the main page but others might disagree. Refs need formatting and filling out (authors/accessdates etc.) Looking ok otherwise.
Casliber (
talk·contribs) 05:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
It seems like I go through this alot, but the refs don't need any changes for DYK. The rules are simply that they not be bare. The refs would need improvement if I were taking this to GAN, but as of now I don't have those plans. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:29, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
ok - I just tried (unsuccessfully) to look for some authors.
Casliber (
talk·contribs) 03:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
I have updated this article with the results of the election. This is ready to be promoted whenever. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 15:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Changed "nominee" to "candidate".
Nyttend (
talk) 22:06, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 08:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Comment: She's running for office, and the election isn't until November 6. It's probably a bad idea to post an active candidate on the main page so close to the election, so I propose this, if approved, be placed in a holding area for mid-November.
I'll assume good faith on the subscription-only refs - rest looks good. Size and age ok and hook reffed. I'm leaning towards the first one. Not so sure the second one is great for the main page but others might disagree. Refs need formatting and filling out (authors/accessdates etc.) Looking ok otherwise.
Casliber (
talk·contribs) 05:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
It seems like I go through this alot, but the refs don't need any changes for DYK. The rules are simply that they not be bare. The refs would need improvement if I were taking this to GAN, but as of now I don't have those plans. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:29, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
ok - I just tried (unsuccessfully) to look for some authors.
Casliber (
talk·contribs) 03:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
I have updated this article with the results of the election. This is ready to be promoted whenever. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 15:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Changed "nominee" to "candidate".
Nyttend (
talk) 22:06, 7 November 2012 (UTC)