The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 ( talk) 01:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Mr.Mr. (song)

• ... that the release of Girls' Generation's " Mr.Mr." was delayed because scenes from the music video were accidentally deleted?

• Reviewed: K'atepan

Improved to Good Article status by HĐ ( talk) and TerryAlex ( talk). Nominated by Random86 ( talk) at 00:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC).

• OK, this is a GA, so that's great--but there are some problems here. Please note my recent edits; I have tried to indicate in edit summaries what reviewers/editors should be looking for, things that appear to have been missed in the GA review. The hook is properly verified, the image seems properly licensed. Drmies ( talk) 16:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

• Drmies, I think I fixed everything except for the references. Do you mean there should only be work/website or publisher, not both? The GA reviewer ( MarioSoulTruthFan) required both. Random86 ( talk) 19:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

• I never required both. According to recent GA standards you only need "work/website". Nevertheless, the nominator had work and publisher quite often, it was missing in some cases so I just asked to add it where it was missing. I asked for archiving the links which was not done until now. Drmies and Random86 thank you for the corrections. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 19:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
• Thanks Random86. Here's the thing. If a publisher (say a university) has a project on their serves (say, the collected works of author X), then it's worthwhile listing both. But listing Time inc as the publisher of Time (magazine) has no additional value. I gotta play a game of Sleeping Queens with my boss and hope to be able to take another look afterward. Drmies ( talk) 19:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks to both for the clarification. All the references are now fixed. Random86 ( talk) 20:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

• Hi MarioSoulTruthFan, FYI, I did archived all the links in the article already.
• Thanks so much Random86. TerryAlex ( talk) 20:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

• TerryAlex out of 28 links, 7 are archived. How about the others? MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 23:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi MarioSoulTruthFan, I already have all the links archived through archive.org or webcitation, but did not put an archive link for them in the article. TerryAlex ( talk) 00:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

You should TerryAlex and if the link is not dead you should put "deadlink=no". If it becomes dead, for some reason, just remove the template and let the archive link do its work. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 10:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)