The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Created by
LavaBaron (
talk). Self-nominated at 18:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC).
New enough, long enough; hook is cited, short enough yet interesting. QPQ done, good to go Satellizer el Bridget(Talk) 04:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Neither
Monique Luiz nor Daisy states that the ad is "famous". In any event, as it was only shown once, calling it famous seems a bit of a stretch.
Edwardx (
talk) 18:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
LavaBaron. If reliable sources call it "famous", that's plenty good enough for me. May well be
WP:CK across the pond, but I'm British.
Edwardx (
talk) 18:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
No problem,
Edwardx. I've gone ahead and added an eighth source that calls the ad "famous", the BBC, in light of this observation.
LavaBaron (
talk) 18:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Just to make sure we have all our bases covered I've also added
Deutsche Presse Agentur calling the ad "famous".
LavaBaron (
talk) 18:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed that the parts of the hook are correct and cited.
Mary Mark Ockerbloom (
talk) 21:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Created by
LavaBaron (
talk). Self-nominated at 18:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC).
New enough, long enough; hook is cited, short enough yet interesting. QPQ done, good to go Satellizer el Bridget(Talk) 04:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Neither
Monique Luiz nor Daisy states that the ad is "famous". In any event, as it was only shown once, calling it famous seems a bit of a stretch.
Edwardx (
talk) 18:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
LavaBaron. If reliable sources call it "famous", that's plenty good enough for me. May well be
WP:CK across the pond, but I'm British.
Edwardx (
talk) 18:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
No problem,
Edwardx. I've gone ahead and added an eighth source that calls the ad "famous", the BBC, in light of this observation.
LavaBaron (
talk) 18:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Just to make sure we have all our bases covered I've also added
Deutsche Presse Agentur calling the ad "famous".
LavaBaron (
talk) 18:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed that the parts of the hook are correct and cited.
Mary Mark Ockerbloom (
talk) 21:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)