- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 09:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Mirabito Outdoor Classic
- ... that the Mirabito Outdoor Classic was the first outdoor game in the 74 year history of the American Hockey League?
- Comment: The number of years can be removed from the hook if necessary. This game happened in 2010 so the league is now 76 years old.
Created/expanded by Leech44 ( talk). Self nom at 15:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Holodiscus dumosus
-
The article size is good, prose size looks good, hook is sourced and of sufficient length. Personally, I think the year should be kept. That way, it would stick out without having to click the link just to see if it was 74 years of history or just 7, and there's a decent difference in impact from it (even if it was two years ago). Good job!
Hurricane Angel Saki (
talk) 00:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 09:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Mirabito Outdoor Classic
- ... that the Mirabito Outdoor Classic was the first outdoor game in the 74 year history of the American Hockey League?
- Comment: The number of years can be removed from the hook if necessary. This game happened in 2010 so the league is now 76 years old.
Created/expanded by Leech44 ( talk). Self nom at 15:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Holodiscus dumosus
-
The article size is good, prose size looks good, hook is sourced and of sufficient length. Personally, I think the year should be kept. That way, it would stick out without having to click the link just to see if it was 74 years of history or just 7, and there's a decent difference in impact from it (even if it was two years ago). Good job!
Hurricane Angel Saki (
talk) 00:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)