The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Carabinieri (
talk) 23:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
ACP2011 (
talk). Self nom at 15:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Looks good. Interesting, well-written. Spot checks reveal that paraphrasing is on this side of too-close, though in some cases only just. To the DYK mover: this is for the Monmouth project. Thanks,
Drmies (
talk) 17:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. I'll double check again for close paraphrasing.
Anne (
talk) 22:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Carabinieri (
talk) 23:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
ACP2011 (
talk). Self nom at 15:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Looks good. Interesting, well-written. Spot checks reveal that paraphrasing is on this side of too-close, though in some cases only just. To the DYK mover: this is for the Monmouth project. Thanks,
Drmies (
talk) 17:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. I'll double check again for close paraphrasing.
Anne (
talk) 22:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)