The result was: promoted by
Allen3
talk 23:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth ( talk). Self nominated at 17:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC).
Now, the geography section is likewise poorly sourced (the website of the commune), and not all of its contents are geographical anyway. The page I suggested above actually doesn't verify all of this content, and the few other pages I browsed on that website don't either.
Then, the Fossil site paragraph is difficult also. With the reference given from Lethaia (the doi appears to be incorrect, but I got it through Academic Search Premier) one could build some really interesting content since it's an important site and the reference for the Middle Villafranchian biozone (MN17), but our article has nothing to say on the topic--and that, basically, it's important because the bones indicate the age of the sediments is a bit odd (it's not an issue here) and the article in Lethaia doesn't say that. That leaves the claim of "one of only two locations"--I might be wrong, but the only statement in the cited reference that comes close to that is "Tooth characters of fossil badgers from two localities Saint Vallier in southeastern France and Binagady in Azerbaijan were studied." In other words, the "one of only two" is not verified, as far as I can tell.
Put all this together and we have an article that, in my opinion, should not go on since it's simply not ready. Drmies ( talk) 03:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Allen3
talk 23:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth ( talk). Self nominated at 17:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC).
Now, the geography section is likewise poorly sourced (the website of the commune), and not all of its contents are geographical anyway. The page I suggested above actually doesn't verify all of this content, and the few other pages I browsed on that website don't either.
Then, the Fossil site paragraph is difficult also. With the reference given from Lethaia (the doi appears to be incorrect, but I got it through Academic Search Premier) one could build some really interesting content since it's an important site and the reference for the Middle Villafranchian biozone (MN17), but our article has nothing to say on the topic--and that, basically, it's important because the bones indicate the age of the sediments is a bit odd (it's not an issue here) and the article in Lethaia doesn't say that. That leaves the claim of "one of only two locations"--I might be wrong, but the only statement in the cited reference that comes close to that is "Tooth characters of fossil badgers from two localities Saint Vallier in southeastern France and Binagady in Azerbaijan were studied." In other words, the "one of only two" is not verified, as far as I can tell.
Put all this together and we have an article that, in my opinion, should not go on since it's simply not ready. Drmies ( talk) 03:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)