The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 19:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Article is long enough and was expanded in the last three days. Sourcing looks good, as does Earwig. Both hooks are interesting and cited inline in the article, I prefer ALT0. No picture nominated so that is N/A. Per
WP:QPQ two reviews will be required to finish up this nom since you're pretty well clear over 20 DYKs.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@
PCN02WPS: The double QPQ is a bit of a surprise, looks like I missed the discussion on this. Does it retroactively apply to all nominations made before March 8? SounderBruce 04:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@
SounderBruce: I have no idea about any discussion; I saw a couple of users enforcing it on nominations before the eighth and checked
WP:QPQ, which says that it's been active for about 24 hours. Hadn't ever heard of it before tonight either. If I'm wrong that would be awesome, I'd have a few extra QPQs to spare.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 05:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@
SounderBruce and
PCN02WPS: Double QPQs are required for nominations after 8 March, not before; said discussion made no mention of the mode applying retroactively, and I think quite rightly.--Launchballer 11:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 19:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Article is long enough and was expanded in the last three days. Sourcing looks good, as does Earwig. Both hooks are interesting and cited inline in the article, I prefer ALT0. No picture nominated so that is N/A. Per
WP:QPQ two reviews will be required to finish up this nom since you're pretty well clear over 20 DYKs.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@
PCN02WPS: The double QPQ is a bit of a surprise, looks like I missed the discussion on this. Does it retroactively apply to all nominations made before March 8? SounderBruce 04:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@
SounderBruce: I have no idea about any discussion; I saw a couple of users enforcing it on nominations before the eighth and checked
WP:QPQ, which says that it's been active for about 24 hours. Hadn't ever heard of it before tonight either. If I'm wrong that would be awesome, I'd have a few extra QPQs to spare.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 05:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@
SounderBruce and
PCN02WPS: Double QPQs are required for nominations after 8 March, not before; said discussion made no mention of the mode applying retroactively, and I think quite rightly.--Launchballer 11:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)