The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 01:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Created by
NinaGreen (
talk). Self nominated at 23:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC).
The following has been checked in this review by Matty.007
QPQ taken care of
Article created by NinaGreen on 10 December 2013, and has 7144 characters of readable prose (slightly outside 5 day limit, but it's a soft line
Every paragraph is sourced. Very last sentence: "There were no issue of the marriage." needs clarification, and preferably a source, but I won't hold it up for it.
Earwig @ Toolserver found no copyvios
Hook is interesting and well sourced
AGF on offline citations
Thanks for the review! I added the source which states that he had no issue by his third wife.
NinaGreen (
talk) 18:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
I didn't quite understand the sentence though, it either should be along the lines of "Their were no issues with the marriage", or something similar, if I've read it right. Thanks,
Matty.007 19:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
The source states that Carleton had no 'issue' (a common term at the time for children) by either his first or third marriages. Hope that helps.
NinaGreen (
talk) 20:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
That clears up a lot. Please can that be made explicit in the article? If it is, I will probably come back to this (probably pass) sometime tomorrow. Thanks,
Matty.007 21:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
OK, I've changed the text to read 'He had no children by his first and third marriages'.
NinaGreen (
talk) 22:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
AGF on offline references, good to go. Thanks,
Matty.007 10:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 01:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Created by
NinaGreen (
talk). Self nominated at 23:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC).
The following has been checked in this review by Matty.007
QPQ taken care of
Article created by NinaGreen on 10 December 2013, and has 7144 characters of readable prose (slightly outside 5 day limit, but it's a soft line
Every paragraph is sourced. Very last sentence: "There were no issue of the marriage." needs clarification, and preferably a source, but I won't hold it up for it.
Earwig @ Toolserver found no copyvios
Hook is interesting and well sourced
AGF on offline citations
Thanks for the review! I added the source which states that he had no issue by his third wife.
NinaGreen (
talk) 18:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
I didn't quite understand the sentence though, it either should be along the lines of "Their were no issues with the marriage", or something similar, if I've read it right. Thanks,
Matty.007 19:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
The source states that Carleton had no 'issue' (a common term at the time for children) by either his first or third marriages. Hope that helps.
NinaGreen (
talk) 20:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
That clears up a lot. Please can that be made explicit in the article? If it is, I will probably come back to this (probably pass) sometime tomorrow. Thanks,
Matty.007 21:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
OK, I've changed the text to read 'He had no children by his first and third marriages'.
NinaGreen (
talk) 22:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
AGF on offline references, good to go. Thanks,
Matty.007 10:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)