The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 16:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Hook fact and quote "likes and dislikes" are verifiable online on page 48 of the 2010 edition
HERE. Moved on 26 Dec from user space to article space.
Created/expanded by
Presearch (
talk). Self nom at 02:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Move date was 27th, rather than 26th, but that obviously still qualifies it for DYK. Article is long enough. Hook is interesting, under 200 characters and verified by citation in article. AGF on offline source. QPQ has been met. Image is used in article, looks fine at a small size and is extracted from a larger free image, but it could do with having its author information updated. I also question whether you really need 15 citations in the last sentence of the lead, but this obviously doesn't have any bearing on your DYK nomination. All in all, good work!
A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 14:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
OK, great, I'll assume this will promote unless I hear otherwise. FYI, per suggestion, I have removed a big batch of the citations from the lede. WRT the image authorship, I know nothing beyond what I can read via WP links. The hook image is the crop of a
larger image that's been in WP Commons a long time and is declared public domain. The larger image was uploaded in 2007 by
commons:User:Mattes who has over 200,000 edits to commons, is still active, has a committed identity, and was only blocked once (in 2006) and not for copyvio. So I'm inclined to think he knows what he's doing WRT image copyrights. He displays the
original uncropped image in his
gallery. I imagine that if anyone could improve authorship info, he could. --
Presearch (
talk) 07:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough, this looks good to go then. Nice job!
A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 13:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 16:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Hook fact and quote "likes and dislikes" are verifiable online on page 48 of the 2010 edition
HERE. Moved on 26 Dec from user space to article space.
Created/expanded by
Presearch (
talk). Self nom at 02:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Move date was 27th, rather than 26th, but that obviously still qualifies it for DYK. Article is long enough. Hook is interesting, under 200 characters and verified by citation in article. AGF on offline source. QPQ has been met. Image is used in article, looks fine at a small size and is extracted from a larger free image, but it could do with having its author information updated. I also question whether you really need 15 citations in the last sentence of the lead, but this obviously doesn't have any bearing on your DYK nomination. All in all, good work!
A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 14:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
OK, great, I'll assume this will promote unless I hear otherwise. FYI, per suggestion, I have removed a big batch of the citations from the lede. WRT the image authorship, I know nothing beyond what I can read via WP links. The hook image is the crop of a
larger image that's been in WP Commons a long time and is declared public domain. The larger image was uploaded in 2007 by
commons:User:Mattes who has over 200,000 edits to commons, is still active, has a committed identity, and was only blocked once (in 2006) and not for copyvio. So I'm inclined to think he knows what he's doing WRT image copyrights. He displays the
original uncropped image in his
gallery. I imagine that if anyone could improve authorship info, he could. --
Presearch (
talk) 07:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough, this looks good to go then. Nice job!
A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 13:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)