The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3  ^talk 09:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Clayton Knight, Katherine Sturges Dodge

• ... that WWI aviator and one of the founders of the Clayton Knight Committee also wrote and illustrated children's books with his wife Katherine Sturges Dodge?

• ALT1:... that WWI aviator, artist, and one of the founders of the Clayton Knight Committee was the father of Hilary Knight, illustrator of the Eloise books?
• Comment: I have less than 5 DYK nominations and thus am exempt from QPQ.

Created by Mchuedem ( talk), TeriEmbrey ( talk). Nominated by TeriEmbrey ( talk) at 19:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC).

• Comment: the anniversary of Knight's birth is March 30. Can it run then? TeriEmbrey ( talk) 15:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

• Reviewed Cyclone Nigel on 3.19.15 TeriEmbrey ( talk) 15:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

I have added an article for Katherine Sturges Dodge and I can add a QPQ to support a hook that includes her. Victuallers ( talk) 23:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC) The QPQ is Patrick Bevin Victuallers ( talk) 22:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

• Full review needed. I've added a DYKmake for the new article, having heard no objections to its inclusion from nominator TeriEmbrey. Perhaps ALT1 should be struck, since it doesn't incorporate the Dodge article? BlueMoonset ( talk) 04:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

• Articles are recent enough, no plagiarism detected, hook is interesting. However, the Clayton Knight Committee article has no inline citations. Please add specific citations to the sources included in the reference section.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 23:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

@ 3family6: I'll see what I can do to fix the Clayton Knight Committee article's inline citations even though I didn't create it. I will have to order a couple of the magazine articles via interlibrary loan. Can the DYK move forward in the interim since Clayton Knight and Katherine Sturges Dodge are the new articles? TeriEmbrey ( talk) 20:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

As the nominator, you can withdraw Clayton Knight Committee from the nomination. However, seeing how long this nom has been listed, I see no problem waiting a few more days for you to get the references.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:21, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

@ 3family6: Ok. The Clayton Knight Committee article now has some in-line references. I will continue to work on it as time allows while we wait for the nomination to be considered. TeriEmbrey ( talk) 16:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

I have para-phrasing concerns to this source. I have fixed it in two places but both of the (Clayton *) articles need to be checked. Victuallers ( talk) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out the close paraphrasing. We'll fix. TeriEmbrey ( talk) 13:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing issue has been fixed. TeriEmbrey ( talk) 15:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

There was also a problem in that Clayton Knight Committee was nor a valid nom for DYK although it has been improved. I have removed it from the template (I think). I think the nomination below reflects the current state of affairs. Victuallers ( talk) 15:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

• ALT 2:... that Clayton Knight, a WWI aviator and artist, wrote and illustrated children's books with his wife Katherine Sturges Dodge?

• Confirming that Clayton Knight Committee has been expanded far less than the required 5x (less than 2x, actually), and does not qualify for DYK. (Removal from template was done correctly.) I've struck ALT1 since it only includes one of the two nominated articles. 3family6, did you want to continue the review, or should we find a new reviewer? Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

• New reviewer needed; previous reviewer has not replied. BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry, this came up in my notifications but I couldn't respond at the time and then forgot about it. I'd prefer a different reviewer take a look with some fresh eyes.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

• These two articles are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are suitably cited. The articles are neutral and I did not detect any copyright problems with the checks I made. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)