From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady ( talk) 01:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Amaryllis (ship)

Created/expanded by Clariosophic ( talk). Nominated by Rcsprinter123 ( talk) at 21:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

  •  In progress Anne ( talk) 17:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Date and length fine. References 1/10, 2/6/12, 3/4/5, and 7/13 are the same and should be consolidated. Reference 3/4/5 is available online here and the URL should be provided. Also, the references in general should be tidied up with more information provided. I find the citation template convenient. If you have any questions on formatting references, I'll be happy to walk you through it. Review still in progress. Anne ( talk) 18:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Ref 9 is also available online here and url should be included. I like hook 1, well-formatted and cited. Article is well-written, no copy vios. No photo to check. QPQ not mandatory. Nominator is not creator. I'd be happy to work with either on refs. Two small factual points: destination New Orleans in article, but Baton Rouge in source. Also, another wreck Mercedes in Corridors in article, but not mentioned by name in source. Anne ( talk) 20:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I've combined some of the duplicate refs. Rcsprinter (rap) @ 21:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I've revised the two newspaper refs so that they're now available online. I don't think that refs have to have access dates for DYK, although it is preferred. Liked the Surf History Project clippings. Any thoughts on the two factual discrepancies I mentioned above? Anne ( talk) 02:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, as I know nothing about the topic I can't really help with any of the facts. Is that a pass then? Rcsprinter (gossip) @ 08:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
  • If the creator is not available to address the two factual errors/discrepancies, I'll go ahead and make the copy edits myself later today. Anne ( talk) 12:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Copy edits done. Anne ( talk) 10:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady ( talk) 01:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Amaryllis (ship)

Created/expanded by Clariosophic ( talk). Nominated by Rcsprinter123 ( talk) at 21:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

  •  In progress Anne ( talk) 17:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Date and length fine. References 1/10, 2/6/12, 3/4/5, and 7/13 are the same and should be consolidated. Reference 3/4/5 is available online here and the URL should be provided. Also, the references in general should be tidied up with more information provided. I find the citation template convenient. If you have any questions on formatting references, I'll be happy to walk you through it. Review still in progress. Anne ( talk) 18:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Ref 9 is also available online here and url should be included. I like hook 1, well-formatted and cited. Article is well-written, no copy vios. No photo to check. QPQ not mandatory. Nominator is not creator. I'd be happy to work with either on refs. Two small factual points: destination New Orleans in article, but Baton Rouge in source. Also, another wreck Mercedes in Corridors in article, but not mentioned by name in source. Anne ( talk) 20:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I've combined some of the duplicate refs. Rcsprinter (rap) @ 21:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I've revised the two newspaper refs so that they're now available online. I don't think that refs have to have access dates for DYK, although it is preferred. Liked the Surf History Project clippings. Any thoughts on the two factual discrepancies I mentioned above? Anne ( talk) 02:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, as I know nothing about the topic I can't really help with any of the facts. Is that a pass then? Rcsprinter (gossip) @ 08:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
  • If the creator is not available to address the two factual errors/discrepancies, I'll go ahead and make the copy edits myself later today. Anne ( talk) 12:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Copy edits done. Anne ( talk) 10:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook