The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Hawkeye7(discuss) 08:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
It's a great hook, but no expansion has occurred on this article so it's not eligible for DYK.
Created/expanded by
Couiros22 (
talk). Self-nominated at 12:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC).
@
Couiros22: What article are you nominating for DYK here?
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
? well, the one in bold letters
Couiros22 (
talk) 09:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
@
Couiros22: It's a great hook, but no expansion has occurred on this article so it's not eligible for DYK. To qualify, articles need to be completely new, be expanded to five times their initial size, or have recently been promoted to
Good Article status. In addition, the article could use improved referencing; one reference at the end of each paragraph is generally considered the minimum acceptable, and since the hook fact is a scientific claim, it's best to reference the peer-reviewed journal article in addition to the popular article. I encourage you to submit an article again if it meets the criteria.
Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
ok, thanks
Couiros22 (
talk) 06:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Hawkeye7(discuss) 08:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
It's a great hook, but no expansion has occurred on this article so it's not eligible for DYK.
Created/expanded by
Couiros22 (
talk). Self-nominated at 12:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC).
@
Couiros22: What article are you nominating for DYK here?
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
? well, the one in bold letters
Couiros22 (
talk) 09:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
@
Couiros22: It's a great hook, but no expansion has occurred on this article so it's not eligible for DYK. To qualify, articles need to be completely new, be expanded to five times their initial size, or have recently been promoted to
Good Article status. In addition, the article could use improved referencing; one reference at the end of each paragraph is generally considered the minimum acceptable, and since the hook fact is a scientific claim, it's best to reference the peer-reviewed journal article in addition to the popular article. I encourage you to submit an article again if it meets the criteria.
Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
ok, thanks
Couiros22 (
talk) 06:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)