Where the Angels Fall

The Cat Empire performing live

• ... that the Cat Empire's (pictured) 2023 album Where the Angels Fall features no less than 75 musicians and 49 instruments?
• ALT1 ... that the Cat Empire's (pictured) 2023 album Where the Angels Fall features contributions from 75 musicians and 49 instruments?
• ALT1a ... that the Cat Empire's 2023 album Where the Angels Fall features contributions from 75 musicians and 49 instruments?

• Reviewed:

SupremeLordBagel ( talk to me) 04:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC).

• Review:

• New enough - promoted to GA same day as nomination;
• Long enough - 10,948 characters;
• QPQ Check - not needed;
• Hook is referenced to a secondary source clearly cited in the article, and source has a clear editorial policy;
• Hook is interesting - remarkable number of musicians and instruments;
• Article is presentable;
• Copyvio is clear "Violation Unlikely", most comparison hits are in quotes;
• The picture is clear and in the article;
• However - while the picture states it is freely licenced, it has been sourced to a facebook post by two people (who retain ownership of the intellectual property per [1]). It is therefore not wholly clear it is freely licenced per WP:IUPC;
• Also - the hook needs the rather subjective text "no less than" removed to something more neutral - e.g. "features contributions from", and the article has 2-3 sentences that need citations.
• This can nearly be approved without the picture. Alternatively to approve this nom for the main page with the picture, I recommend proof "that the copyright holder has released the image under an acceptable free license". Furthermore please resolve the (relatively minor) hook and citation issues. Resonant Dis_tortion 16:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks for your comments! This picture was sourced from the comments of a Facebook post in a fan community for the Cat Empire. In that post, I requested images of the band on tour, making it clear that I was to use them in a Wikipedia article. Would a screenshot of this post and some of the comments be sufficient proof that this image is freely licensed? SupremeLordBagel ( talk to me) 04:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks - that's good but I suggest we get this tighter if the image is to go on the main page. Please see this section in the commons VRT [2]. Resonant Dis_tortion 05:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

I'll work on contacting the original photographers and get back to you when I can. SupremeLordBagel ( talk to me) 09:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry that I haven't replied for a while! I think it's more hassle than it's worth to include the image. We'll go ahead without it. SupremeLordBagel ( talk to me) 10:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Understood and noted, though the licencing on the respective images in the article evidently still need resolution. To get this approved for the hook only can you please (a) create an ALT1a without the "(pictured)" text, and (b) resolve the uncited statements within the article, i.e. "It is also the band's first release since The Cat Empire (2003) to be produced by Andy Baldwin" and "The song debuted at No. 1 on the AMRAP Metro Charts, and stayed in that position for two weeks." Resonant Dis_tortion 14:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)  Done

for ALT1a. Note: picture not approved. Resonant Dis_tortion 23:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)