The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This is new enough, long enough, and impressive, extensive work, written in a careful, encyclopaedic style. I will review in more detail when I finish reading. Neutrality of a potentially controversial topic is handled very well. The only text matches caught by Earwig are publication titles or properly attributed quotations. I think the first hook is the most interesting option and makes it abundantly clear what the article is about. The hook is suitably phrased, succinct, and appears in the article with a suitable source. QPQ done: the nomination was made before 8 March, so the double QPQ requirement does not apply. This is really admirable work: well done!
MartinPoulter (
talk) 15:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This is new enough, long enough, and impressive, extensive work, written in a careful, encyclopaedic style. I will review in more detail when I finish reading. Neutrality of a potentially controversial topic is handled very well. The only text matches caught by Earwig are publication titles or properly attributed quotations. I think the first hook is the most interesting option and makes it abundantly clear what the article is about. The hook is suitably phrased, succinct, and appears in the article with a suitable source. QPQ done: the nomination was made before 8 March, so the double QPQ requirement does not apply. This is really admirable work: well done!
MartinPoulter (
talk) 15:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)