The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 12:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by
Captain Assassin! (
talk). Self-nominated at 09:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC).
Comment - Not a review, but couldn't the hook be reworded thus: that the online streaming mediaNetflix paid $60 million to buy distribution rights to the War Machine?LavaBaron (
talk) 19:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Good to go technically. I moved the newly suggested hook to ALT1, and this is the hook I prefer. The other is acceptable, but verbose. References work, hook properly cited, Article works. Do we need a QPQ from this submitter? I get so confused with QPQs
FiddleFaddle 20:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
He needs a QPQ,
Timtrent. You might want to change your to in the interim. I don't personally care, but you'll spare yourself a concert from DYK's Hallelujah Chorus if you change it.
LavaBaron (
talk) 21:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
No need. A tick says that the nomination is ready for promotion; superseding it with the ? icon (at the left, where it's easily seen) keeps this from showing up as being ready for promotion while the quid pro quo review is still outstanding.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
The QPQ thing is remarkably confusing for those of us who nominate rarely and review rarely. I'm quite grown up and have always failed to get my head around it.
FiddleFaddle 22:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
True. We're trying to make things less confusing; hopefully the RFC on the DYK Talk page will pass to enable that to happen.
LavaBaron (
talk) 22:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
@
Timtrent: QPQ's here, so please restore the tick. Thanks. --
Captain Assassin!«
T ♦
C ♦
G» 03:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I see the QPQ and marvel at the arcane system that obtains here.
FiddleFaddle 07:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 12:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by
Captain Assassin! (
talk). Self-nominated at 09:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC).
Comment - Not a review, but couldn't the hook be reworded thus: that the online streaming mediaNetflix paid $60 million to buy distribution rights to the War Machine?LavaBaron (
talk) 19:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Good to go technically. I moved the newly suggested hook to ALT1, and this is the hook I prefer. The other is acceptable, but verbose. References work, hook properly cited, Article works. Do we need a QPQ from this submitter? I get so confused with QPQs
FiddleFaddle 20:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
He needs a QPQ,
Timtrent. You might want to change your to in the interim. I don't personally care, but you'll spare yourself a concert from DYK's Hallelujah Chorus if you change it.
LavaBaron (
talk) 21:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
No need. A tick says that the nomination is ready for promotion; superseding it with the ? icon (at the left, where it's easily seen) keeps this from showing up as being ready for promotion while the quid pro quo review is still outstanding.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
The QPQ thing is remarkably confusing for those of us who nominate rarely and review rarely. I'm quite grown up and have always failed to get my head around it.
FiddleFaddle 22:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
True. We're trying to make things less confusing; hopefully the RFC on the DYK Talk page will pass to enable that to happen.
LavaBaron (
talk) 22:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
@
Timtrent: QPQ's here, so please restore the tick. Thanks. --
Captain Assassin!«
T ♦
C ♦
G» 03:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I see the QPQ and marvel at the arcane system that obtains here.
FiddleFaddle 07:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)