The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Long enough and new enough. The hook is interesting and properly cited. Within policy, images licensed and no copyvio found in prose. QPQ is still required. I would also suggest the lead should be longer per
WP:LEAD given the length of the article, but that is not something to hold up DYK approval. QPQ is required but has not been done.
SpinningSpark 23:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
@
Spinningspark:, Thank you for the review. QPQ done. I will expand the article after DYK and take it to GA. So I will rewrite the lead after the expansion. Regards,-
Nizil (
talk) 05:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
It's a bit odd that you moved the page to mainspace before you finished expanding the article, but this is now ready for DYK.
SpinningSpark 10:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Article was in draftspace for months. I moved it to mainspace because it was large enough and good enough to be in mainspace. Further expansion will be for GA.-
Nizil (
talk) 04:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Long enough and new enough. The hook is interesting and properly cited. Within policy, images licensed and no copyvio found in prose. QPQ is still required. I would also suggest the lead should be longer per
WP:LEAD given the length of the article, but that is not something to hold up DYK approval. QPQ is required but has not been done.
SpinningSpark 23:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
@
Spinningspark:, Thank you for the review. QPQ done. I will expand the article after DYK and take it to GA. So I will rewrite the lead after the expansion. Regards,-
Nizil (
talk) 05:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
It's a bit odd that you moved the page to mainspace before you finished expanding the article, but this is now ready for DYK.
SpinningSpark 10:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Article was in draftspace for months. I moved it to mainspace because it was large enough and good enough to be in mainspace. Further expansion will be for GA.-
Nizil (
talk) 04:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)