The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Orlady (
talk) 22:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment: This is a date request for the June 10th 0:00 (UTC) queue which is the exact time when the
67th Tony Awards will air.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 06:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Created by
TonyTheTiger (
talk). Self nominated at 06:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC).
Well, I can approve this article, whether or not it goes up on its own or in a multi-hook. Personally I think it's better to go with separate hooks, so more attention is drawn to each article. Hook fact is verified in this source
[1], though it's written more as a throwaway line in the article. I'd recommend a slight rewrite to the hook:
And definitely support holding this for June 10. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 19:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
The only way I would go with this as a separate hook is if the others are not approved. I am going for the record.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 20:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
for alt1 which I think is more understandable. I can confirm hook size, citation and reference are OK. I like this better than the confusing alt hooks in
Template:Did you know nominations/The Assembled Parties. Also confirmed the authorship, size and newness of the article.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 10:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Since when do we approve hooks twice and after they are already in the approved hooks section.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 11:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The alt5 there is definitely the most understandable. Because the play titles look like chunks of English text they make the sentences in the hooks tricky to understand. So if you say a lot, the meaning will be lost to the rapid reader.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 12:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Well. I hope someone approves one with a picture, but will accept whatever happens.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 13:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Orlady (
talk) 22:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment: This is a date request for the June 10th 0:00 (UTC) queue which is the exact time when the
67th Tony Awards will air.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 06:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Created by
TonyTheTiger (
talk). Self nominated at 06:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC).
Well, I can approve this article, whether or not it goes up on its own or in a multi-hook. Personally I think it's better to go with separate hooks, so more attention is drawn to each article. Hook fact is verified in this source
[1], though it's written more as a throwaway line in the article. I'd recommend a slight rewrite to the hook:
And definitely support holding this for June 10. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 19:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
The only way I would go with this as a separate hook is if the others are not approved. I am going for the record.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 20:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
for alt1 which I think is more understandable. I can confirm hook size, citation and reference are OK. I like this better than the confusing alt hooks in
Template:Did you know nominations/The Assembled Parties. Also confirmed the authorship, size and newness of the article.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 10:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Since when do we approve hooks twice and after they are already in the approved hooks section.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 11:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The alt5 there is definitely the most understandable. Because the play titles look like chunks of English text they make the sentences in the hooks tricky to understand. So if you say a lot, the meaning will be lost to the rapid reader.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 12:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Well. I hope someone approves one with a picture, but will accept whatever happens.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 13:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)