The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Miyagawa(talk) 14:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Toa Nidhiki05 (
talk). Self nom at 21:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Length is fine - by my calculations, the expansion has taken the article from 1100 characters of prose to 9800. Hook checks out, and everything else seems fine. However, I don't think the hook should have the word "over" - it sold 167,000 copies in its first week.
StAnselm (
talk) 02:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
That's fine with me - it relays the same point either way. ToaNidhiki05 02:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Miyagawa(talk) 14:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Toa Nidhiki05 (
talk). Self nom at 21:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Length is fine - by my calculations, the expansion has taken the article from 1100 characters of prose to 9800. Hook checks out, and everything else seems fine. However, I don't think the hook should have the word "over" - it sold 167,000 copies in its first week.
StAnselm (
talk) 02:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
That's fine with me - it relays the same point either way. ToaNidhiki05 02:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)