The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3talk 08:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
No progress resolving outstanding issues after a week
Created/expanded by
Bonkers The Clown (
talk). Self nom at 09:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Article has about 1079 characters of prose, below the 1500 minimum for dyk.
Chris857 (
talk) 21:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
How about now? I think issues have already been addressed.
Bonkers The Clown (
talk) 13:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Needs a full review.
Chris857 (
talk) 14:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Article has numerous unsourced paragraphs and orange tags for POV and advertising for the past three or so days. Unless it can be cleaned up soon, it's a no. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 02:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Over a week since the article was tagged, and almost six full days since author was notified of outstanding issues. No edits made here or to article, although many edits have been made on Wikipedia in the interim. As per Muboshgu, it's a no.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3talk 08:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
No progress resolving outstanding issues after a week
Created/expanded by
Bonkers The Clown (
talk). Self nom at 09:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Article has about 1079 characters of prose, below the 1500 minimum for dyk.
Chris857 (
talk) 21:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
How about now? I think issues have already been addressed.
Bonkers The Clown (
talk) 13:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Needs a full review.
Chris857 (
talk) 14:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Article has numerous unsourced paragraphs and orange tags for POV and advertising for the past three or so days. Unless it can be cleaned up soon, it's a no. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 02:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Over a week since the article was tagged, and almost six full days since author was notified of outstanding issues. No edits made here or to article, although many edits have been made on Wikipedia in the interim. As per Muboshgu, it's a no.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)