The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk) 13:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Comment: The spelling of the composer's surname is deliberate. This is explained in a note in the lead.
5x expanded by
Corachow (
talk). Self-nominated at 22:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC).
Starting review.
Zeete (
talk) 15:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Expanded 5x on January 20 (from 1,117 to 7,035 per DYK check), cited, neutral, Earwig reported ok (Violation unlikely, 32.0%, one long quotation), QPQ done, hook interesting, cited, length checked ok. Big improvement over the earlier version. AGF, preview unavailable for book refs. Note small typo in quote, s/b decorations. Consider using Tchaikovsky as common usage spelling in other places.
Good to go. Thanks,
Zeete (
talk) 16:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The error in the quote is a grammatical error in the source. I put " [sic]" instead. I also changed the common spelling for the composer outside of the titles.
Corachow (
talk) 15:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk) 13:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Comment: The spelling of the composer's surname is deliberate. This is explained in a note in the lead.
5x expanded by
Corachow (
talk). Self-nominated at 22:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC).
Starting review.
Zeete (
talk) 15:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Expanded 5x on January 20 (from 1,117 to 7,035 per DYK check), cited, neutral, Earwig reported ok (Violation unlikely, 32.0%, one long quotation), QPQ done, hook interesting, cited, length checked ok. Big improvement over the earlier version. AGF, preview unavailable for book refs. Note small typo in quote, s/b decorations. Consider using Tchaikovsky as common usage spelling in other places.
Good to go. Thanks,
Zeete (
talk) 16:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The error in the quote is a grammatical error in the source. I put " [sic]" instead. I also changed the common spelling for the composer outside of the titles.
Corachow (
talk) 15:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)