The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Article briefly appeared on the "recent deaths" section of the mainpage. As
previously discussed by both the letter of the rules (non bold link) and spirit of the rules (typically very little updating is required for RD) that shouldn't disqualify the article from DYK.
I'm okay with the precedent of RD not counting as ITN per DYK rules. The article is a five-fold expansion and well sourced. Hook fact is supported by
this source. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Article briefly appeared on the "recent deaths" section of the mainpage. As
previously discussed by both the letter of the rules (non bold link) and spirit of the rules (typically very little updating is required for RD) that shouldn't disqualify the article from DYK.
I'm okay with the precedent of RD not counting as ITN per DYK rules. The article is a five-fold expansion and well sourced. Hook fact is supported by
this source. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)