The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Alright! I've just recovered from the booster shot so I can now get back to this - pinging @
Adog as courtesy
The article was nominated for DYK the same day it passed GA; long enough and sufficiently cited to RS.
Earwig gives a good score
QPQ done.
All hooks are present in the article and cited to the same sources. No verifiability or OR issues found. I have a personal preference for ALTs 0 and 1 - I think they can prove interesting to a broad audience - though I wish it could be clipped for extra punchiness. I don't think we need to specify the roller coaster manufacturer in both hooks, honestly. Something like ... that the train design for the Tigris roller coaster was revealed in the form of a cake? is better. Though for the most part, we're good to go
@
Your Power: Appreciate the review :). I hope you are not feeling too bad after the boost. I agree with the more punchy hook as an "ALT 0.5" of the combined hooks.
Adog (
Talk・
Cont) 16:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
ALT 0.5 ... that the
train design for the Tigris roller coaster was revealed in the form of a
cake? — Here is the hook with links for the mover, thanks to Your Power for the suggestion.
Adog (
Talk・
Cont) 16:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Alright! I've just recovered from the booster shot so I can now get back to this - pinging @
Adog as courtesy
The article was nominated for DYK the same day it passed GA; long enough and sufficiently cited to RS.
Earwig gives a good score
QPQ done.
All hooks are present in the article and cited to the same sources. No verifiability or OR issues found. I have a personal preference for ALTs 0 and 1 - I think they can prove interesting to a broad audience - though I wish it could be clipped for extra punchiness. I don't think we need to specify the roller coaster manufacturer in both hooks, honestly. Something like ... that the train design for the Tigris roller coaster was revealed in the form of a cake? is better. Though for the most part, we're good to go
@
Your Power: Appreciate the review :). I hope you are not feeling too bad after the boost. I agree with the more punchy hook as an "ALT 0.5" of the combined hooks.
Adog (
Talk・
Cont) 16:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
ALT 0.5 ... that the
train design for the Tigris roller coaster was revealed in the form of a
cake? — Here is the hook with links for the mover, thanks to Your Power for the suggestion.
Adog (
Talk・
Cont) 16:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)