The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 06:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Article long enough and new enough at time of nomination. Supported throughout by inline citations and also written in a neutral tone. Minor instances of close paraphrases noticed
here but not substantial. Hook is short enough, interesting and supported by
this citation. QPQ done.
EagerToddler39 (
talk) 22:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 06:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Article long enough and new enough at time of nomination. Supported throughout by inline citations and also written in a neutral tone. Minor instances of close paraphrases noticed
here but not substantial. Hook is short enough, interesting and supported by
this citation. QPQ done.
EagerToddler39 (
talk) 22:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)