The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yazan (
talk) 13:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Not a self-nom. --
PFHLai (
talk) 04:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Glad to see more horses at DYK, eh? Cheers! --
PFHLai (
talk) 04:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Yngvadottir (
talk). Nominated by
PFHLai (
talk) at 04:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
quality article on an important piece of art, good hook, all well sourced, offline sources accepted AGF (and yes, glad to see more horses), --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 16:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yazan (
talk) 13:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Not a self-nom. --
PFHLai (
talk) 04:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Glad to see more horses at DYK, eh? Cheers! --
PFHLai (
talk) 04:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Yngvadottir (
talk). Nominated by
PFHLai (
talk) at 04:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
quality article on an important piece of art, good hook, all well sourced, offline sources accepted AGF (and yes, glad to see more horses), --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 16:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)