The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 16:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
New enough and without doubt long enough, reads in a neutral manner. Both hooks are interesting and well-sourced. Nominator has one DYK credit, thus is exempt from QPQ. Good to go. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
The Almightey Drill (
talk •
contribs) 16:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 16:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
New enough and without doubt long enough, reads in a neutral manner. Both hooks are interesting and well-sourced. Nominator has one DYK credit, thus is exempt from QPQ. Good to go. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
The Almightey Drill (
talk •
contribs) 16:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)