The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 15:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Article became Good Article on July 10, satisfying recency req't. Article is long enough (i.e., over 100,000 characters in all), uses ample (i.e., 150-ish) in-line citations and appears to be neutrally written. Hooks are short enough, interesting enough, and verified by
this source. IMO, the original hook is the most interesting, though I can see that the alts may offer a bit more mystery. Spot checking doesn't reveal problems with plagiarism or copyright violation. No QPQ needed since this is not a self-nomination.
Cbl62 (
talk) 03:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 15:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Article became Good Article on July 10, satisfying recency req't. Article is long enough (i.e., over 100,000 characters in all), uses ample (i.e., 150-ish) in-line citations and appears to be neutrally written. Hooks are short enough, interesting enough, and verified by
this source. IMO, the original hook is the most interesting, though I can see that the alts may offer a bit more mystery. Spot checking doesn't reveal problems with plagiarism or copyright violation. No QPQ needed since this is not a self-nomination.
Cbl62 (
talk) 03:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)