The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Article is long enough, was promoted to GA before the nomination, and is in good shape overall, as I'd expect of a recently promoted GA. Both hook facts are adequately supported by reliable sources, and spot-checks of a few of the other notes revealed no concerning issues (I wouldn't expect any from TRM anyway). The time in the main hook was on the page after the number in the cite, but I took the liberty of fixing this on TRM's behalf in his absence. Either hook would do for me. Also, it's worth noting that it looks like they're now making non-self-nominators do QPQ reviews as well, but I believe this is grandfathered in because the nomination started before the rules change. All in all, this appears to be good to go.
Giants2008 (
Talk) 23:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Article is long enough, was promoted to GA before the nomination, and is in good shape overall, as I'd expect of a recently promoted GA. Both hook facts are adequately supported by reliable sources, and spot-checks of a few of the other notes revealed no concerning issues (I wouldn't expect any from TRM anyway). The time in the main hook was on the page after the number in the cite, but I took the liberty of fixing this on TRM's behalf in his absence. Either hook would do for me. Also, it's worth noting that it looks like they're now making non-self-nominators do QPQ reviews as well, but I believe this is grandfathered in because the nomination started before the rules change. All in all, this appears to be good to go.
Giants2008 (
Talk) 23:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)