The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Created by
Jon698 (
talk). Self-nominated at 01:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC).
The article was created back in November 2019 making it completely ineligible. But this can be nominated under moved to the main page from draft. ~~
CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
CAPTAIN MEDUSA, as a reviewer you should check to see whether the article qualifies as new, and this one does since it was moved to mainspace on February 26, which in fact makes it completely eligible. While it is nice if the nominator selects the best category, doing so is confusing enough that this doesn't always happen, and the fact remains that this was created by the nominator and qualifies for DYK. Please continue your review on that basis; we never request a renomination when an article was eligible when it was nominated. Thank you.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Cited: - I see "2-to-1" polling is used in the lead, but I can't find the phrase in the body of the article, or a synonymous fact ("34% approval"?), with an inline citation.
Interesting: - I'm not convinced that the hook is written in a particularly interesting way; we could reword it, or use the potential alt below.
QPQ: - I believe you're at five DYK credits, and for the sixth one we require that you review someone else's DYK nomination (if you've done one, I don't see it). Overall:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Created by
Jon698 (
talk). Self-nominated at 01:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC).
The article was created back in November 2019 making it completely ineligible. But this can be nominated under moved to the main page from draft. ~~
CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
CAPTAIN MEDUSA, as a reviewer you should check to see whether the article qualifies as new, and this one does since it was moved to mainspace on February 26, which in fact makes it completely eligible. While it is nice if the nominator selects the best category, doing so is confusing enough that this doesn't always happen, and the fact remains that this was created by the nominator and qualifies for DYK. Please continue your review on that basis; we never request a renomination when an article was eligible when it was nominated. Thank you.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Cited: - I see "2-to-1" polling is used in the lead, but I can't find the phrase in the body of the article, or a synonymous fact ("34% approval"?), with an inline citation.
Interesting: - I'm not convinced that the hook is written in a particularly interesting way; we could reword it, or use the potential alt below.
QPQ: - I believe you're at five DYK credits, and for the sixth one we require that you review someone else's DYK nomination (if you've done one, I don't see it). Overall: