The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93talk 01:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Drive-by nomination, as it's been around 6.875 days since this was converted from a redirect and I want to get this in under the wire. I have a small amount of work to do, starting with the excision of those ugly
WP:CLUMPs. Note that I've included 'credited' because, as can quite clearly be seen in the image in the cited source, series 4 winners Spelbound also contained women. Also noting that the majority of this article was created by an IP.
Created by
Launchballer (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 234 past nominations.
Review: Newly expanded article from a redirect meeting the required length size of prose. BLP is notable to exist as a standalone article now passing
WP:ARTIST. No apparent copyvios. QPQ done. Rest article seems fine. Problem comes with only the fact that this is a synthesis and hence not perfectly verifiable. Do we have any another source mentioning her to be the first woman winner without a dog? Or else, do we have anything else from the article to a new hook? §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
It's in
HuffPost, which I've added back to the article.--Launchballer 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I can't see that source. Googling 'credit define' gives one definition of 'publicly acknowledge a contributor's role in the production of (something published or broadcast)' - is there not a similar definition in the OED source? And if not, how would you convey this information? (HuffPost, the piece used in the article, says "the only solo woman to ever triumph on BGT without the aid of a dog sidekick", but I would argue that "Ashleigh and Pudsey" is quite clearly a double act.)--Launchballer 10:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Could we not say "first individual woman" or something? I agree that "first credited woman" reads oddly here. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 06:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93talk 01:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Drive-by nomination, as it's been around 6.875 days since this was converted from a redirect and I want to get this in under the wire. I have a small amount of work to do, starting with the excision of those ugly
WP:CLUMPs. Note that I've included 'credited' because, as can quite clearly be seen in the image in the cited source, series 4 winners Spelbound also contained women. Also noting that the majority of this article was created by an IP.
Created by
Launchballer (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 234 past nominations.
Review: Newly expanded article from a redirect meeting the required length size of prose. BLP is notable to exist as a standalone article now passing
WP:ARTIST. No apparent copyvios. QPQ done. Rest article seems fine. Problem comes with only the fact that this is a synthesis and hence not perfectly verifiable. Do we have any another source mentioning her to be the first woman winner without a dog? Or else, do we have anything else from the article to a new hook? §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
It's in
HuffPost, which I've added back to the article.--Launchballer 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I can't see that source. Googling 'credit define' gives one definition of 'publicly acknowledge a contributor's role in the production of (something published or broadcast)' - is there not a similar definition in the OED source? And if not, how would you convey this information? (HuffPost, the piece used in the article, says "the only solo woman to ever triumph on BGT without the aid of a dog sidekick", but I would argue that "Ashleigh and Pudsey" is quite clearly a double act.)--Launchballer 10:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Could we not say "first individual woman" or something? I agree that "first credited woman" reads oddly here. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 06:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)