The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 14:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Date length and hook are fine. There is a single, lengthy source and page numbers are given, but the page numbers do not display when I look at the pdf file. The
duplicate detector detects some duplication but I do not consider it is excessive considering the subject matter involved.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 14:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Date length and hook are fine. There is a single, lengthy source and page numbers are given, but the page numbers do not display when I look at the pdf file. The
duplicate detector detects some duplication but I do not consider it is excessive considering the subject matter involved.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)