From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Sukur's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know DYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 ( talk) 21:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC).

Sukur

Sukur

5x expanded by Nvvchar ( talk), Rosiestep ( talk). Nominated by Rosiestep ( talk) at 01:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Hook is interesting enough, not too long. Article was indeed 5x expanded in the appropriate timeframe. Has the right sources. Seems to be ready to go!—♦♦ AMBER (ЯʘCK) 19:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

This article still appears to be classed as a 'stub' and I'm afraid a basic DYK criteria is that it must not be a stub. It's covered under D11 of the supplementary guide. SagaciousPhil - Chat 14:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, changed to start.-- Nvvchar. 01:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

re-instate Amberrock's DYK tick as my query has been addressed. SagaciousPhil - Chat 06:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Sukur's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know DYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 ( talk) 21:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC).

Sukur

Sukur

5x expanded by Nvvchar ( talk), Rosiestep ( talk). Nominated by Rosiestep ( talk) at 01:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Hook is interesting enough, not too long. Article was indeed 5x expanded in the appropriate timeframe. Has the right sources. Seems to be ready to go!—♦♦ AMBER (ЯʘCK) 19:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

This article still appears to be classed as a 'stub' and I'm afraid a basic DYK criteria is that it must not be a stub. It's covered under D11 of the supplementary guide. SagaciousPhil - Chat 14:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, changed to start.-- Nvvchar. 01:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

re-instate Amberrock's DYK tick as my query has been addressed. SagaciousPhil - Chat 06:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook