The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 22:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by Mujinga ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 01:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC).
Length | Newness | Cited hook | Interest | Sources | Neutrality | Plagiarism/paraphrase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Word count fine, recency fine, supported hooks, well-sourced, no sign of copyvio, QPQ done. I find the first book dull compared to the second (quite interesting) so this is hereby approved as good to go for ALT1. there’s nothing *wrong with the first hook but the second is more compelling.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 22:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by Mujinga ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 01:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC).
Length | Newness | Cited hook | Interest | Sources | Neutrality | Plagiarism/paraphrase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Word count fine, recency fine, supported hooks, well-sourced, no sign of copyvio, QPQ done. I find the first book dull compared to the second (quite interesting) so this is hereby approved as good to go for ALT1. there’s nothing *wrong with the first hook but the second is more compelling.