The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Orlady (
talk) 04:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
... that a study conducted by the
BBC series Son of God concluded that the skin of
Jesus Christ(artist's impression pictured) would have been "olive-coloured" and "swarthy"?
The hook is perfectly fine. But the article is not new.
A large part of it existed on Nov 13, 2011. There has been a recent expansion, but it doesn't seem to be 5-fold or more.VRtalk 00:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I moved the article from my userspace to the main article space with
this edit, which therefore qualifies its "newness" for 27 November.
A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 00:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh, I think I see what you're trying to say. This is really weird though. Because it gives the impression that the article has been around for a long time, when it really only appeared in mainspace on Nov 27. Thus it seems to me that this DYK entry qualifies all the necessary criteria. However, someone else should also check it, since I could be wrong (again).VRtalk 06:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Image is also good to go.VRtalk 06:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Moved date checks out. Please conduct the rest of the review.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 13:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Article is apparently new, long enough, within policy. Hook is less than 200 characters and sourced. Image is free.VRtalk 04:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Orlady (
talk) 04:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
... that a study conducted by the
BBC series Son of God concluded that the skin of
Jesus Christ(artist's impression pictured) would have been "olive-coloured" and "swarthy"?
The hook is perfectly fine. But the article is not new.
A large part of it existed on Nov 13, 2011. There has been a recent expansion, but it doesn't seem to be 5-fold or more.VRtalk 00:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I moved the article from my userspace to the main article space with
this edit, which therefore qualifies its "newness" for 27 November.
A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 00:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh, I think I see what you're trying to say. This is really weird though. Because it gives the impression that the article has been around for a long time, when it really only appeared in mainspace on Nov 27. Thus it seems to me that this DYK entry qualifies all the necessary criteria. However, someone else should also check it, since I could be wrong (again).VRtalk 06:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Image is also good to go.VRtalk 06:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Moved date checks out. Please conduct the rest of the review.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 13:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Article is apparently new, long enough, within policy. Hook is less than 200 characters and sourced. Image is free.VRtalk 04:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)