The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Flibirigit (
talk) 15:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by FuzzyMagma ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/ Simon Connell; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge.which is where I used his University webpage that describes his role, also see WP:BLPSELFPUB although I didn’t include any thing Wikipedia considers as self published work. Publications he has appeared in, like Nature, has a very high editorial standards and generally accepted as reliable sources FuzzyMagma ( talk) 12:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
He has an h-index of 121 from publishing numerous articles and has been cited by many researchers.You could possibly use Google Scholar to say "Connell has a h-index of 121 over his entire career according to Google Scholar" but the rest of the information is analysis of a primary source.
A few ABOUSELF sources for simple facts are fineI didn’t use beyond few sentences in the small section about his Career. I’m glad you dropped the argument about information he published in Nature as self published as when you stated “
self-written biographies on his university websites or publications he has appeared in” as these are not in the remit of self-published work. FuzzyMagma ( talk) 08:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
publishing numerous articles that has been cited by many researchersisn't original research when it depends on an editor deciding what numbers equate to "numerous" and "many researchers". For all I know, these numbers could be very normal or even low for an academic working in that field and not remarkable at all.
Use of self-sourced material should be de minimis; the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent sources.WP:PRIMARY states
Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them.The article currently is based on 23 sources of which 16 (70%!) are either primary or about-self (depending on how the source is used some are both of these).
According to the South African National Research Foundation, he is highly regarded and acknowledged internationally for his accomplishment
Furthermore, he has been involved in engineering and technical activities related to the Beyond Standard Model search at CERN, which is focused on High Energy Physics.
In addition, Simon Connell has given presentations and talks about the African Light Source project.
Connell has contributed to the development and promotion of the AfLS, advocating for the establishment of this facility in Africa.
The project has gained momentum and support from the scientific community.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Flibirigit (
talk) 15:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by FuzzyMagma ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/ Simon Connell; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge.which is where I used his University webpage that describes his role, also see WP:BLPSELFPUB although I didn’t include any thing Wikipedia considers as self published work. Publications he has appeared in, like Nature, has a very high editorial standards and generally accepted as reliable sources FuzzyMagma ( talk) 12:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
He has an h-index of 121 from publishing numerous articles and has been cited by many researchers.You could possibly use Google Scholar to say "Connell has a h-index of 121 over his entire career according to Google Scholar" but the rest of the information is analysis of a primary source.
A few ABOUSELF sources for simple facts are fineI didn’t use beyond few sentences in the small section about his Career. I’m glad you dropped the argument about information he published in Nature as self published as when you stated “
self-written biographies on his university websites or publications he has appeared in” as these are not in the remit of self-published work. FuzzyMagma ( talk) 08:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
publishing numerous articles that has been cited by many researchersisn't original research when it depends on an editor deciding what numbers equate to "numerous" and "many researchers". For all I know, these numbers could be very normal or even low for an academic working in that field and not remarkable at all.
Use of self-sourced material should be de minimis; the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent sources.WP:PRIMARY states
Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them.The article currently is based on 23 sources of which 16 (70%!) are either primary or about-self (depending on how the source is used some are both of these).
According to the South African National Research Foundation, he is highly regarded and acknowledged internationally for his accomplishment
Furthermore, he has been involved in engineering and technical activities related to the Beyond Standard Model search at CERN, which is focused on High Energy Physics.
In addition, Simon Connell has given presentations and talks about the African Light Source project.
Connell has contributed to the development and promotion of the AfLS, advocating for the establishment of this facility in Africa.
The project has gained momentum and support from the scientific community.