The following is an archived discussion of Sex for Breakfast's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s
(talk) page, the nominated article's
(talk) page, or the Did you know(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page.See the talk page guidelines for
(more) information.
The result was: promoted by —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 23:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC).
No QPQ required but obligatory whining about DYK regulars nominating while not reviewing others out of a sense of it is the right thing to do. :P (Though Crisco does fabulous work with moving things to prep.)
New enough and long enough at time of nomination. Neutral enough article. It is completely supported by inline citations. Hook is properly formatted. image on article has image with an acceptable copyright tag. It pains me to to say both hook, alt1 and alt2 are supported by sources.
big block of text is quote. Other checks bring up no concerns for plagiarism.
Is main hook okay BLP wise? Prefer alt, no matter the sex related drama associated it, as a result. --
LauraHale (
talk) 03:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Good to go. Preference for Alt1 because I think it has fewer BLP concerns. --
LauraHale (
talk) 03:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Any feedback regarding April Fools? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 03:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Do you want to wait over a year? :P --
LauraHale (
talk) 03:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of Sex for Breakfast's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s
(talk) page, the nominated article's
(talk) page, or the Did you know(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page.See the talk page guidelines for
(more) information.
The result was: promoted by —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 23:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC).
No QPQ required but obligatory whining about DYK regulars nominating while not reviewing others out of a sense of it is the right thing to do. :P (Though Crisco does fabulous work with moving things to prep.)
New enough and long enough at time of nomination. Neutral enough article. It is completely supported by inline citations. Hook is properly formatted. image on article has image with an acceptable copyright tag. It pains me to to say both hook, alt1 and alt2 are supported by sources.
big block of text is quote. Other checks bring up no concerns for plagiarism.
Is main hook okay BLP wise? Prefer alt, no matter the sex related drama associated it, as a result. --
LauraHale (
talk) 03:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Good to go. Preference for Alt1 because I think it has fewer BLP concerns. --
LauraHale (
talk) 03:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Any feedback regarding April Fools? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 03:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Do you want to wait over a year? :P --
LauraHale (
talk) 03:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)