The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Yoninah (
talk) 19:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
not a 5x expansion
Sorry, but unless I'm missing something, this article hasn't been expanded enough to be suitable for DYK (the prose size prior to the recent improvements was 2700 characters, it now stands at 6305 characters. That's only slightly more than a 2x increase). It's a nice article, but I'm afraid it doesn't seem to meet the requirements of DYK.
Yunshui雲水 13:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Yoninah (
talk) 19:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
not a 5x expansion
Sorry, but unless I'm missing something, this article hasn't been expanded enough to be suitable for DYK (the prose size prior to the recent improvements was 2700 characters, it now stands at 6305 characters. That's only slightly more than a 2x increase). It's a nice article, but I'm afraid it doesn't seem to meet the requirements of DYK.
Yunshui雲水 13:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)