The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 10:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
TonyTheTiger, these reviews still need to be completed (I don't see any icons yet, and many review facets are not yet covered), especially since you've already used one of these as a QPQ for a nomination that has been promoted to the main page. Thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 05:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I have been awaiting response from
Al Ameer son on whether the third article is going to be bolded in the hook or not. I'll take a look in the next few days.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 05:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the long delay. I have made mention of both Sanur and the Jarrar clan in the throne villages article. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 22:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Sanur, Jenin is largely sourced offline, but the first online source I checked (ref 24) did not support the claimed fact.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 10:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
You have fixed the first ref I had a problem with. Now the second one I looked at (2) gave no indication it was in a foreign language. Fix all footnotes to indicate foreign language sources (This is English Wikipedia).--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 22:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
The second ref you mentioned points to page 106, which is written in both English and Arabic (it's just a population table). Anyway, I added the Arabic icon to the citation. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 01:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Throne village has several claims backed up by online refs. The first one I checked (3a) did not match the source. (only one dozen not two).--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 10:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Ref 24 was the wrong url (it was for
Tulkarm Governorate), I replaced it with the correct url for Jenin Governorate. As for the throne villages url, I can see how this could be misleading so I removed the citation from that particular sentences. The UNESCO page you visited lists 13 villages, but this is just a sample of the major throne villages. The RIWAQ source lists 26 throne villages. The Irving source also states "two dozen 'Throne Villages' emerged ..." — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Al Ameer son (
talk •
contribs) 16:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I just replaced it with an archived version. Just a note about the offline refs, you'll probably be able to verify them with the links provided in the bibliography. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 22:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Have you noted the foreign languages for all relevant references in all three articles?--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 07:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes. There was one offline source in French, which I made note of in the citation. The rest of the sources are in English. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 05:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
So many of these refs are offline that I have to
WP:AGF for most of the content. Although most of the refs that I checked needed to be corrected for one reason or another, we are suppose to AGF on offline refs and so I will. The articles appear to generally adhere to
WP:MOS otherwise.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 05:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. You'll probably be able to check the offline sources through google books (the links are in the Bibliography section) if you search the key terms. If you have trouble, I can help with any specific questions. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 15:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 10:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
TonyTheTiger, these reviews still need to be completed (I don't see any icons yet, and many review facets are not yet covered), especially since you've already used one of these as a QPQ for a nomination that has been promoted to the main page. Thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 05:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I have been awaiting response from
Al Ameer son on whether the third article is going to be bolded in the hook or not. I'll take a look in the next few days.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 05:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the long delay. I have made mention of both Sanur and the Jarrar clan in the throne villages article. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 22:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Sanur, Jenin is largely sourced offline, but the first online source I checked (ref 24) did not support the claimed fact.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 10:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
You have fixed the first ref I had a problem with. Now the second one I looked at (2) gave no indication it was in a foreign language. Fix all footnotes to indicate foreign language sources (This is English Wikipedia).--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 22:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
The second ref you mentioned points to page 106, which is written in both English and Arabic (it's just a population table). Anyway, I added the Arabic icon to the citation. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 01:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Throne village has several claims backed up by online refs. The first one I checked (3a) did not match the source. (only one dozen not two).--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 10:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Ref 24 was the wrong url (it was for
Tulkarm Governorate), I replaced it with the correct url for Jenin Governorate. As for the throne villages url, I can see how this could be misleading so I removed the citation from that particular sentences. The UNESCO page you visited lists 13 villages, but this is just a sample of the major throne villages. The RIWAQ source lists 26 throne villages. The Irving source also states "two dozen 'Throne Villages' emerged ..." — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Al Ameer son (
talk •
contribs) 16:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I just replaced it with an archived version. Just a note about the offline refs, you'll probably be able to verify them with the links provided in the bibliography. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 22:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Have you noted the foreign languages for all relevant references in all three articles?--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 07:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes. There was one offline source in French, which I made note of in the citation. The rest of the sources are in English. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 05:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
So many of these refs are offline that I have to
WP:AGF for most of the content. Although most of the refs that I checked needed to be corrected for one reason or another, we are suppose to AGF on offline refs and so I will. The articles appear to generally adhere to
WP:MOS otherwise.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 05:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. You'll probably be able to check the offline sources through google books (the links are in the Bibliography section) if you search the key terms. If you have trouble, I can help with any specific questions. --
Al Ameer (
talk) 15:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)