The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment: The £3 billion figure is supported by the second source and provides context to those unfamiliar with crore and Indian rupee.
Created by
Dee03 (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC).
I am reviewing these articles. I will do minor corrections myself in the article rather than writing them down here. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 10:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Both are new articles submitted to DYK within timeline. Hook fact checks out through multiple references. The image is ok and reviewed on Commons. The articles are both long enough without any possible copyvios. However, we tend to convert all currencies into USD only, not GBP. I guess we can use ₹20,000
crore (equivalent to ₹340 billion or US$4.1 billion in 2023) here. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 05:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I am okay with the USD figure as long as others don't object for lack of citations. Might I suggest keeping it to ₹20,000
crore (US$3.7 billion) so that the hook stays within the 200-character limit?
Dee03 12:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
I found a source that has the value in USD as US$3 billion
[5]. IMO, it would be better to present this 2013 value instead of INRconvert template's inflation-adjusted current value.
Dee03 13:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment: The £3 billion figure is supported by the second source and provides context to those unfamiliar with crore and Indian rupee.
Created by
Dee03 (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC).
I am reviewing these articles. I will do minor corrections myself in the article rather than writing them down here. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 10:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Both are new articles submitted to DYK within timeline. Hook fact checks out through multiple references. The image is ok and reviewed on Commons. The articles are both long enough without any possible copyvios. However, we tend to convert all currencies into USD only, not GBP. I guess we can use ₹20,000
crore (equivalent to ₹340 billion or US$4.1 billion in 2023) here. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 05:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I am okay with the USD figure as long as others don't object for lack of citations. Might I suggest keeping it to ₹20,000
crore (US$3.7 billion) so that the hook stays within the 200-character limit?
Dee03 12:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
I found a source that has the value in USD as US$3 billion
[5]. IMO, it would be better to present this 2013 value instead of INRconvert template's inflation-adjusted current value.
Dee03 13:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)