The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
@
Myip003 and
Graeme Bartlett: Very thorough work! There are a few issues to work out but they are minor. I'd say this is very close to Good Article status if these issues are dealt with, and I'd encourage a nomination for that status.
New and long enough, Earwig detects no copyvios, QPQ done. I changed the wikilinks in the hook to emphasize the article is specifically about the deformation. Good job on the original images!
A couple of paragraphs lack citations, and a lot don't have citations at the very end of the paragraph, making it unclear what the final sentence(s) are cited to.
Orphan banner needs to be dealt with.
I doubt that caption of the lead image is accurate: pure rock salt would be colorless, and the original caption (on the Flickr page) does not claim that this is a pure sample.
It looks like there are a lot of primary research articles used as sources; it is generally better to rely on review articles but this is beyond the scope of a DYK review so it's okay for now.
@
Graeme Bartlett@
Antony-22 I have added the citations, checked at the orphan banners and modified the caption for the lead image, I also added two diagrams explaining the deformation mechanism at a micro scale.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
@
Myip003 and
Graeme Bartlett: Very thorough work! There are a few issues to work out but they are minor. I'd say this is very close to Good Article status if these issues are dealt with, and I'd encourage a nomination for that status.
New and long enough, Earwig detects no copyvios, QPQ done. I changed the wikilinks in the hook to emphasize the article is specifically about the deformation. Good job on the original images!
A couple of paragraphs lack citations, and a lot don't have citations at the very end of the paragraph, making it unclear what the final sentence(s) are cited to.
Orphan banner needs to be dealt with.
I doubt that caption of the lead image is accurate: pure rock salt would be colorless, and the original caption (on the Flickr page) does not claim that this is a pure sample.
It looks like there are a lot of primary research articles used as sources; it is generally better to rely on review articles but this is beyond the scope of a DYK review so it's okay for now.
@
Graeme Bartlett@
Antony-22 I have added the citations, checked at the orphan banners and modified the caption for the lead image, I also added two diagrams explaining the deformation mechanism at a micro scale.