The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Fuebaey (
talk) 19:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
long enough, no copyright issues, properly ref'd
Djflem (
talk) 10:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The article given as a
QPQ for this nomination is in fact another article nomination by
Shhhhwwww!!.
Shhhhwwww!! needs to review another article, not write another one.
Numerous paragraphs in this article do not have at least one cite, per DYK rules.
Yoninah (
talk) 22:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
There is no requirement for a citation per paragraph. Appear to be no other nominations by
Shhhhwwww!! making that less than five.
Djflem (
talk) 20:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The one cite per paragraph guideline is
Rule D2: The article in general should use inline, cited sources. A rule of thumb is one inline citation per paragraph, excluding the intro, plot summaries, and paragraphs which summarize other cited content.
Shhhhwwww!!'s talk page has just been pinged after failing to respond after over two weeks. Given that Shhhhwwww!! has a history of nominating for DYK and not providing QPQ reviews, this icon will be superseded by an "X" in short order.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
User Shhhhwwww!! appears to have two more DYK noms with outstanding QPQ including --
Esemono (
talk) 05:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Fuebaey (
talk) 19:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
long enough, no copyright issues, properly ref'd
Djflem (
talk) 10:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The article given as a
QPQ for this nomination is in fact another article nomination by
Shhhhwwww!!.
Shhhhwwww!! needs to review another article, not write another one.
Numerous paragraphs in this article do not have at least one cite, per DYK rules.
Yoninah (
talk) 22:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
There is no requirement for a citation per paragraph. Appear to be no other nominations by
Shhhhwwww!! making that less than five.
Djflem (
talk) 20:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The one cite per paragraph guideline is
Rule D2: The article in general should use inline, cited sources. A rule of thumb is one inline citation per paragraph, excluding the intro, plot summaries, and paragraphs which summarize other cited content.
Shhhhwwww!!'s talk page has just been pinged after failing to respond after over two weeks. Given that Shhhhwwww!! has a history of nominating for DYK and not providing QPQ reviews, this icon will be superseded by an "X" in short order.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
User Shhhhwwww!! appears to have two more DYK noms with outstanding QPQ including --
Esemono (
talk) 05:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)