The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 19:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Overall: ALT0 looks more interesting to me and is ready to go. Some general notes on the article: the lead really needs expanding to at least a full paragraph; and I believe it's standard practice to list just a few of an academic's articles/chapters/reviews (maybe 10 in total) rather than all of them. — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Usernameunique: please take care of the lead so this can be promoted. Thanks,
Yoninah (
talk) 12:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Yoninah: I'm agreed that the article doesn't comply with
MOS:LEAD at the moment but I'm confused as to which of the
DYK rules requires compliance with MOS:LEAD. Why is this a valid reason to hold the article back? — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Bilorv: articles that appear on the main page must comply with all Wikipedia standards. Also see
WP:DYKSG#D7. The goal is not to run things through the DYK process, but to make sure articles don't end up at ERRORS or with extra tags as soon as they hit the main page.
Yoninah (
talk) 14:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
That's just the same assertion again, not backed up by a rule. An article which complies with all Wikipedia standards is known as a "featured article". D7 doesn't say anything of the sort. Nevertheless, I've expanded the lead
in this edit per
WP:SOFIXIT, a much more productive approach than all this time-wasting and tag-bombing. — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks,
Bilorv. Restoring your tick.
Yoninah (
talk) 19:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 19:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Overall: ALT0 looks more interesting to me and is ready to go. Some general notes on the article: the lead really needs expanding to at least a full paragraph; and I believe it's standard practice to list just a few of an academic's articles/chapters/reviews (maybe 10 in total) rather than all of them. — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Usernameunique: please take care of the lead so this can be promoted. Thanks,
Yoninah (
talk) 12:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Yoninah: I'm agreed that the article doesn't comply with
MOS:LEAD at the moment but I'm confused as to which of the
DYK rules requires compliance with MOS:LEAD. Why is this a valid reason to hold the article back? — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Bilorv: articles that appear on the main page must comply with all Wikipedia standards. Also see
WP:DYKSG#D7. The goal is not to run things through the DYK process, but to make sure articles don't end up at ERRORS or with extra tags as soon as they hit the main page.
Yoninah (
talk) 14:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
That's just the same assertion again, not backed up by a rule. An article which complies with all Wikipedia standards is known as a "featured article". D7 doesn't say anything of the sort. Nevertheless, I've expanded the lead
in this edit per
WP:SOFIXIT, a much more productive approach than all this time-wasting and tag-bombing. — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks,
Bilorv. Restoring your tick.
Yoninah (
talk) 19:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)