The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 14:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
New enough (expanded from redirect March 31), long enough (5,397 characters), well-cited throughout to reputable sources, neutral, and free from troubling close para/copyvio issues (the
one source with more than seven or eight words appearing in the article is from a PD FDA source). Hook is 134 characters, definitely both timely and interesting and useful, and cited to and in ref 12. QPQ done and no image (although the sneezing one from the article is pretty expressive and could definitely be used). Good to go! —
Collintc 22:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 14:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
New enough (expanded from redirect March 31), long enough (5,397 characters), well-cited throughout to reputable sources, neutral, and free from troubling close para/copyvio issues (the
one source with more than seven or eight words appearing in the article is from a PD FDA source). Hook is 134 characters, definitely both timely and interesting and useful, and cited to and in ref 12. QPQ done and no image (although the sneezing one from the article is pretty expressive and could definitely be used). Good to go! —
Collintc 22:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)