The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that the relation "being a sibling" is irreflexive because no one can be their own sibling? Source: [2]
ALT2: ... that in the 19th century, philosophers changed their understanding of relations in response to developments in logic, mathematics, and science? Source: [3]
MacBride, Fraser (2020).
"Relations". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
Improved to Good Article status by
Phlsph7 (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.
Freshly promoted GA, looks quite solid, not copyvio. ALT0 and ALT1 are good hooks, correctly sourced and interesting. For ALT2, the sources could be a bit more explicit about the 19th century, but I agree this is correct. I am not sure it is as interesting as the other two. QPQ has been done. Approved. —
Kusma (
talk) 11:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that the relation "being a sibling" is irreflexive because no one can be their own sibling? Source: [2]
ALT2: ... that in the 19th century, philosophers changed their understanding of relations in response to developments in logic, mathematics, and science? Source: [3]
MacBride, Fraser (2020).
"Relations". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
Improved to Good Article status by
Phlsph7 (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.
Freshly promoted GA, looks quite solid, not copyvio. ALT0 and ALT1 are good hooks, correctly sourced and interesting. For ALT2, the sources could be a bit more explicit about the 19th century, but I agree this is correct. I am not sure it is as interesting as the other two. QPQ has been done. Approved. —
Kusma (
talk) 11:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)