The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 10:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
The article is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral, well cited and Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows no close paraphrasing. QPQ done. The hook is formatted correctly, interesting and cited. Looks good.
Retroplum (
talk) 21:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 10:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
The article is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral, well cited and Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows no close paraphrasing. QPQ done. The hook is formatted correctly, interesting and cited. Looks good.
Retroplum (
talk) 21:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)