The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Long enough at 1,876 characters, new enough as created on 22 May, well sourced by journals so AGF, its neutrally written and hook is definitely interesting. Im not sure the hook is right though, should it not be 90% of the mass rather than 90% as massive.
BletheringScot 21:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Ok - made it noun/noun...how's that?
Cas Liber (
talk·contribs) 21:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Yeah that is fine and reads more like it does in the article. This is good to go.
BletheringScot 21:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Long enough at 1,876 characters, new enough as created on 22 May, well sourced by journals so AGF, its neutrally written and hook is definitely interesting. Im not sure the hook is right though, should it not be 90% of the mass rather than 90% as massive.
BletheringScot 21:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Ok - made it noun/noun...how's that?
Cas Liber (
talk·contribs) 21:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Yeah that is fine and reads more like it does in the article. This is good to go.
BletheringScot 21:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)