The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Overall: To preemptively address any potential issue of
WP:RECENTISM, I believe the article is nicely written to give substantial historical perspective of past purchase proposals. Looks good to go.
Ergo Sum 04:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Overall: To preemptively address any potential issue of
WP:RECENTISM, I believe the article is nicely written to give substantial historical perspective of past purchase proposals. Looks good to go.
Ergo Sum 04:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)