The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 22:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Casliber (
talk). Self-nominated at 12:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC).
New enough, long enough (>5x expansion), within policy. AGF by seasoned editor on reference which isn't available online. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent close-paraphrasing. Interesting hook; its length is fine. No imgs. QPQ done. GTG. --
Rosiestep (
talk) 04:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 22:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Casliber (
talk). Self-nominated at 12:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC).
New enough, long enough (>5x expansion), within policy. AGF by seasoned editor on reference which isn't available online. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent close-paraphrasing. Interesting hook; its length is fine. No imgs. QPQ done. GTG. --
Rosiestep (
talk) 04:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)